Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DEVELOP-721: removing checkqc threshold check #55

Conversation

nkongenelly
Copy link
Contributor

@nkongenelly nkongenelly commented Feb 23, 2024

The code here has removed ReadsPerSample as the reads per sample threshold was been taken directly from the config, but we need it to be divided with the number of samples in the lane.
This is the quick fix as implementing the reads per sample threshold was only now been used in the flowcell report, and in that one we include all projects.

Copy link
Contributor

@Aratz Aratz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

Just have a suggestion about the PR itself, it's nice if you always write some background in the PR description explaining the problem you're trying to solve, it makes reviewing easier now and it will also make it easier to understand why these changes were made in the future, e.g. in case ticket DEVELOP-721 disappears in JIRA.

@nkongenelly
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Aratz . Thanks for that reminder.

I have now updated this PR with the description.

@nkongenelly nkongenelly force-pushed the DEVELOP-721_fix_checkqc_threshold_values_used branch from f0acf22 to 9dac5f3 Compare March 4, 2024 15:42
Copy link
Collaborator

@matrulda matrulda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

@nkongenelly nkongenelly merged commit d88e32b into Molmed:main Mar 6, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants