-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Issues: NSLS-II/pyCHX
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
extracting onekey from pyCHX results file returns an empty dictionary
bug
discussion
V1
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#68
opened Jun 21, 2021 by
ambarb
can we generalize specklepart of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
discussion
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
V3
lower priority, could be before V2 or after V2
_process
so that bincount can be used on floats?
_commonspeckle
#65
opened Mar 31, 2021 by
ambarb
Why is there a get_max_countc?
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
question
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#62
opened Feb 12, 2021 by
ambarb
Delete functions from DEVS that are deployed in production modules
V3
lower priority, could be before V2 or after V2
#61
opened Feb 12, 2021 by
ambarb
3 tasks
multiple instances of function/variable required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
ps
for different purposes
question
V2
#60
opened Feb 9, 2021 by
ambarb
2 of 5 tasks
v2/_commonspeckle/Two_Time_Correlation_Function.py ToDos for V2
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#59
opened Feb 9, 2021 by
ambarb
4 tasks
move specific functions from V3 chx_generic_fn to specific modules
V3
lower priority, could be before V2 or after V2
#58
opened Feb 8, 2021 by
ambarb
where should functions that save XPCS / speckle results go?
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
discussion
_futurepyCHX
part of V2, future pyCHX once XPCS/speckle analysis is fully separated
#57
opened Feb 8, 2021 by
ambarb
looks like chx_speckle has a function requiring compressed data argument
bug
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
V1
#55
opened Feb 5, 2021 by
ambarb
resolve poisson and gamma distributions between _commonspeckle and skbeam
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
question
skbeam conflict
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#54
opened Feb 5, 2021 by
ambarb
1 of 2 tasks
Evaluate data-handler situation for CHX detector data
_futurepyCHX
part of V2, future pyCHX once XPCS/speckle analysis is fully separated
help wanted
question
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#53
opened Feb 5, 2021 by
ambarb
speckle visibility - consolidate code
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#52
opened Feb 3, 2021 by
ambarb
1 of 9 tasks
What is FD?
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
_futurepyCHX
part of V2, future pyCHX once XPCS/speckle analysis is fully separated
make poll
question
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#51
opened Feb 3, 2021 by
ambarb
test and delete tqdm patch
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#50
opened Feb 2, 2021 by
ambarb
3 tasks
Move olog report functions to databroker or bluesky or someother NSLS-ii repo for all?
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
_futurepyCHX
part of V2, future pyCHX once XPCS/speckle analysis is fully separated
question
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#49
opened Feb 2, 2021 by
ambarb
2 tasks
handlers seems to have no active function, delete module??
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
_futurepyCHX
part of V2, future pyCHX once XPCS/speckle analysis is fully separated
question
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#48
opened Feb 2, 2021 by
ambarb
2 tasks
imports & params commented out from V1 release - can we delete or not?
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
_futurepyCHX
part of V2, future pyCHX once XPCS/speckle analysis is fully separated
question
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#44
opened Oct 15, 2020 by
ambarb
[v2] replacement for ModestImage dependancy
discussion
help wanted
question
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#43
opened Oct 9, 2020 by
ambarb
1 of 2 tasks
[v2][_commonspeckle] what about functions for SMI?
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
Q-space
question
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#42
opened Oct 8, 2020 by
ambarb
[v2][_commonspeckle] SAXS.py not strictly for XPCS or speckles
_commonspeckle
part of V2, but strictly related to a common repo (speckle + maybe scattering)
discussion
Q-space
V2
required to move towards share XPCS/speckle analysis for CHX/CSX
#41
opened Oct 8, 2020 by
ambarb
Previous Next
ProTip!
Exclude everything labeled
bug
with -label:bug.