You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are no entries for this cohort/db on the Orphan Concepts tab. However, their database does contain "orphan" terms. They use 42536383-"anaphylaxis shock", which was not part of our definition but now we know should be. Cohort Diagnostics would have caught this if there had just been 1 person who met the original C8 definition.
Now it could be argued that this can only be seen in Phoebe, however, I think it is work thinking if it is possible to expose in CohortDiagnosis as well.
Well - we did make cohort diagnostics only run on cohorts that yielded cohorts (that was the initial design)
I did change that behavior in a develop branch once - for such uses cases
@azimov i think its reasonable to support such use cases. In fact - we can have scenarios where the cohort was never instantiated (i.e. cohort generator was never run) - and we just get design diagnostics back
Is there a way to look for orphan concepts for a phenotype where a phenotype does not produce a count.
motivating example:
Anaphylaxis in IPCI came up with 0 people:
https://data.ohdsi.org/Covid19SubjectsAesiIncidenceRate/
(1) Cohort Counts
(2) DB = IPCI
(3) Cohorts = C8
C8 = https://atlas.ohdsi.org/#/cohortdefinition/349
There are no entries for this cohort/db on the Orphan Concepts tab. However, their database does contain "orphan" terms. They use 42536383-"anaphylaxis shock", which was not part of our definition but now we know should be. Cohort Diagnostics would have caught this if there had just been 1 person who met the original C8 definition.
Now it could be argued that this can only be seen in Phoebe, however, I think it is work thinking if it is possible to expose in CohortDiagnosis as well.
Thx to @marcel1334 and @azzashoaibi for helping identify this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: