-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #184 from OHDSI/themis_9
closes OHDSI/CommonDataModel#629
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
59 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: When to exclude persons from the CDM | ||
keywords: person | ||
last_updated: April 10, 2024 | ||
tags: [person] | ||
summary: "Considerations for excluding persons from the CDM." | ||
sidebar: mydoc_sidebar | ||
permalink: /excluded_persons.html | ||
--- | ||
|
||
## Issue # and location | ||
- [Themis issue #9]([#9](https://github.com/OHDSI/Themis/issues/9)) | ||
|
||
## Issue summary | ||
How and when should persons be excluded from the CDM? What factors go into this decision? | ||
|
||
## Convention type | ||
Global | ||
|
||
## CDM table | ||
NA | ||
|
||
## CDM field | ||
NA | ||
|
||
## Links to issue discussion | ||
- [OHDSI Forums discussion](http://forums.ohdsi.org/t/eliminating-persons-themis-wg3-topic-2/3974) | ||
|
||
## Provenance of data | ||
General, All | ||
|
||
## The ratified convention | ||
It is not required that all subjects from the raw data be carried over to the CDM, in fact removing people that are not of high enough quality may help researchers using the CDM. Persons should be removed if: | ||
|
||
- Their year of birth or age are unreasonable (e.g. born in year 0, 1800 or 2999) | ||
- They do not have a year of birth and it cannot be derived | ||
- They do not have a gender | ||
- There is reason to believe their data is not of high quality | ||
|
||
Removal of a patient is not required and should be made in consideration of the raw data source. Reasons for removal of persons should be documented in the ETL documentation and METADATA table. | ||
|
||
## Date of ratification/published | ||
April 24, 2018 | ||
|
||
## Downstream implications | ||
No | ||
|
||
## Link to DQD check | ||
|
||
- [isRequired](https://ohdsi.github.io/DataQualityDashboard/articles/checks/isRequired.html) | ||
- [plausibleValueHigh](https://ohdsi.github.io/DataQualityDashboard/articles/checks/plausibleValueHigh.html) | ||
- [plausibleValueLow](https://ohdsi.github.io/DataQualityDashboard/articles/checks/plausibleValueLow.html) | ||
|
||
## Related conventions/further information | ||
NA |