-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Redefine technology
and include subclasses
#1572
Comments
technology
My proposal for a redefinition of technology is: A technology is a plan specification that describes how to combine artificial objects or other material entities and processes in a specific way. From that I propose define To spell out some subclasses that are needed for the OEKG:
We instead define the following relations via new object properties:
And more specific for
Sorry for this long comment but OpenEnergyPlatform/oekg#43 sparked a lot of ideas which I wanted to keep. |
An alternative approach to the specific object properties would be to have only one axiom that catches all. For example for the Or for This might also help solving the problem described in #1350 (comment) as we then probably a lot of |
Thanks @l-emele I like the proposals! |
technology
technology
and include subclasses
Discussed bilaterally with @stap-m :
|
I had the idea of adding an elucidation to About heat technologies:
|
Regarding the plant versus unit question: I had the same question when implementing wind power technology and its subclasses. For
But for
While in "normal" heat transfers, the thermal energy flows from the higher to the lower temperature. In contrast, in heat transfers involving heat pumps the thermal energy flows from lower to higher temperatures. Maybe we need additional subclasses of heat transfer with normal versus reversed heat flow. |
For solar power technology I have to options to axiomatise the process part:
Both are equivalent, currently I use the first one. Did you have also axioms where you can basically choose between to equivalent axioms without one being better than the other? |
For the scenario bundles it is important to continue here rather soon. Missing is still
|
From bilateral meeting with @l-emele Storage technologies:
Mobility technologies:
|
…y-technology Add (electric) mobility technology #1572
…-technologies add energy storage technologies #1572
CCS technology is being discussed in #1760 |
I opened seperate issues for non-energetic use for energy carriers and heat technologies and close here. |
Description of the issue
Discussion in OpenEnergyPlatform/oekg#43 has shown that our current definition of
technology
1 is not useful for the OEKG use case. Also for the OEKG use case we need subclasses.Ideas of solution
If you already have ideas for the solution describe them here
Workflow checklist
I am aware that
Footnotes
A Technology is an information content entity that specifies how to create an artificial object. ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: