Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] mathematical model is inferred as energy #1844

Closed
5 tasks
stap-m opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1852
Closed
5 tasks

[Bug] mathematical model is inferred as energy #1844

stap-m opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1852
Assignees
Labels
[B] restructure Restructuring existing parts of the ontology

Comments

@stap-m
Copy link
Contributor

stap-m commented Apr 24, 2024

Description of the issue

mathematical model is currently inferred as subclass of energy, which is a bug, obviously.

grafik

Ideas of solution

tbd

Workflow checklist

  • I discussed the issue with someone else than me before working on a solution
  • I already read the latest version of the workflow for this repository
  • The goal of this ontology is clear to me

I am aware that

  • every entry in the ontology should have a definition
  • classes should arise from concepts rather than from words
@stap-m stap-m added [B] restructure Restructuring existing parts of the ontology To do Issues that haven't got discussed yet labels Apr 24, 2024
@stap-m stap-m self-assigned this Apr 24, 2024
@stap-m stap-m added this to the oeo-release-2.3.0 milestone Apr 24, 2024
@l-emele
Copy link
Contributor

l-emele commented Apr 24, 2024

I can confirm this bug and found a second, related one:
grafik

@l-emele
Copy link
Contributor

l-emele commented Apr 24, 2024

Both classes have has role axioms and we extended the domain of has role to energy or 'independent continuant'. Does that cause the problem?

@stap-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

stap-m commented Apr 24, 2024

That would also be my guess.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the To do Issues that haven't got discussed yet label Apr 24, 2024
@stap-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

stap-m commented Apr 25, 2024

I think, we can solve it by the import of #1794 , adding the inverse object properties and giving 'role of' the domain 'role' and range 'continuant' (model is a continuant). Thus, we can specify which bearer each role has.

@stap-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

stap-m commented May 3, 2024

waits for #1838

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[B] restructure Restructuring existing parts of the ontology
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants