-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update tahoma and mfc42 verb: use fileExists #1116
Merged
Merged
Changes from 26 commits
Commits
Show all changes
29 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
06ad52f
Merge pull request #1 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 86fd07c
Update script.js
ImperatorS79 a6f232b
Merge pull request #2 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 a80aa84
Merge pull request #3 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 6da4a59
Merge pull request #4 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 4a11f65
Merge pull request #8 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 b2d5724
Merge pull request #9 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 b7d1f0f
Merge pull request #10 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 533df6e
Merge pull request #11 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 186e4ed
Merge pull request #12 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 99cf1db
Merge pull request #13 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 87999b4
Merge pull request #15 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 610b258
Merge pull request #16 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 ad2ea01
Merge pull request #17 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 2e53a22
Merge pull request #18 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 10f93ca
Merge pull request #20 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 ade899d
Merge pull request #21 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 db6e1b9
Merge pull request #23 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 da1a517
Merge pull request #26 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 72863e6
Merge pull request #28 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 f812551
Merge pull request #33 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 a3f62ce
Update script.js
ImperatorS79 d3ab4e2
Update script.js
ImperatorS79 276da5b
Update script.js
ImperatorS79 9d34f45
Update script.js
ImperatorS79 d842fae
Merge branch 'master' into file-exists
ImperatorS79 3d71e50
Merge pull request #36 from PhoenicisOrg/master
ImperatorS79 b21f5af
Update script.js
ImperatorS79 2d1b2aa
Update script.js
ImperatorS79 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The method name sounds strange in this case. Should we add a dedicated method for folders? What do you think @plata @ImperatorS79?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can do that. Would basically be an alias then, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually I'm not sure. If we decide to split the functionality into a
fileExists
anddirectoryExists
method we could also test whether the given path is not a file/directory but instead a directory/file, depending on the regarded method.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds reasonable.