Dedicated us inputs scenarios

docs/release_notes.rst

@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ Upcoming Release
 
 * Align `snakemake` version and the related `mock_snakemake` to PyPSA-Eur (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/177)
 
+* US-specific scenarios for electrolyzers and DAC + adjustment for inflation removed as already considered in input data (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/181)
+
 `v0.11.0 <https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/releases/tag/v0.11.0>`__ (24th January 2025)
 =======================================================================================
 

outputs/US/costs_2020.csv

@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
 technology,parameter,value,unit,source,further description,currency_year,financial_case,scenario
-Alkaline electrolyzer,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+Alkaline electrolyzer,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Moderate
+Alkaline electrolyzer,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Conservative
+Alkaline electrolyzer,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Advanced
 Alkaline electrolyzer,efficiency,0.65,p.u.,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
-Alkaline electrolyzer,investment,1019.8742,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+Alkaline electrolyzer,investment,1146.0,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Moderate
+Alkaline electrolyzer,investment,1471.0,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Conservative
+Alkaline electrolyzer,investment,662.0,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Advanced
 Alkaline electrolyzer,lifetime,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
 Ammonia cracker,FOM,4.3,%/year,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.017 , table 7.","Estimated based on Labour cost rate, Maintenance cost rate, Insurance rate, Admin. cost rate and Chemical & other consumables cost rate.",2015.0,,
 Ammonia cracker,ammonia-input,1.46,MWh_NH3/MWh_H2,"ENGIE et al (2020): Ammonia to Green Hydrogen Feasibility Study (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880826/HS420_-_Ecuity_-_Ammonia_to_Green_Hydrogen.pdf), Fig. 10.",Assuming a integrated 200t/d cracking and purification facility. Electricity demand (316 MWh per 2186 MWh_LHV H2 output) is assumed to also be ammonia LHV input which seems a fair assumption as the facility has options for a higher degree of integration according to the report).,,,
@@ -823,7 +827,7 @@ Fischer-Tropsch,carbondioxide-input,0.32,t_CO2/MWh_FT,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptio
 Fischer-Tropsch,efficiency,0.7,per unit,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
 Fischer-Tropsch,electricity-input,0.04,MWh_el/MWh_FT,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,"0.005 MWh_el input per FT output, output increasing from 2020 to 2050 (0.65, 0.7, 0.73, 0.75 MWh liquid FT output).",,,
 Fischer-Tropsch,hydrogen-input,1.43,MWh_H2/MWh_FT,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,"0.995 MWh_H2 per output, output increasing from 2020 to 2050 (0.65, 0.7, 0.73, 0.75 MWh liquid FT output).",,,
-Fischer-Tropsch,investment,1509724.4026,USD/MW_FT,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,"Well developed technology, no significant learning expected.",2022.0,,
+Fischer-Tropsch,investment,1696429.0,USD/MW_FT,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
 Fischer-Tropsch,lifetime,20.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
 Gasnetz,FOM,2.5,%,"WEGE ZU EINEM KLIMANEUTRALEN ENERGIESYSEM, Anhang zur Studie, Fraunhofer-Institut für Solare Energiesysteme ISE, Freiburg",Gasnetz,2020.0,,
 Gasnetz,investment,28.0,EUR/kWGas,"WEGE ZU EINEM KLIMANEUTRALEN ENERGIESYSEM, Anhang zur Studie, Fraunhofer-Institut für Solare Energiesysteme ISE, Freiburg",Gasnetz,2020.0,,
@@ -2213,9 +2217,13 @@ Offshore Wind - Class 9,investment,4985.097885601565,USD/kW,NREL/ATB-https://dat
 Offshore Wind - Class 9,investment,4751.853123408093,USD/kW,NREL/ATB-https://data.openei.org/s3_viewer?bucket=oedi-data-lake&prefix=ATB%2Felectricity%2Fcsv%2F2022%2F,,2020.0,R&D,Advanced
 Offshore Wind - Class 9,investment,5399.213615724163,USD/kW,NREL/ATB-https://data.openei.org/s3_viewer?bucket=oedi-data-lake&prefix=ATB%2Felectricity%2Fcsv%2F2022%2F,,2020.0,R&D,Conservative
 Offshore Wind - Class 9,investment,4985.097885601565,USD/kW,NREL/ATB-https://data.openei.org/s3_viewer?bucket=oedi-data-lake&prefix=ATB%2Felectricity%2Fcsv%2F2022%2F,,2020.0,R&D,Moderate
-PEM electrolyzer,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+PEM electrolyzer,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Moderate
+PEM electrolyzer,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Conservative
+PEM electrolyzer,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Advanced
 PEM electrolyzer,efficiency,0.63,p.u.,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
-PEM electrolyzer,investment,1220.1113,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+PEM electrolyzer,investment,1371.0,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Moderate
+PEM electrolyzer,investment,2399.0,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Conservative
+PEM electrolyzer,investment,447.0,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Advanced
 PEM electrolyzer,lifetime,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
 PHS,FOM,0.89,%/year,NREL/ATB-https://data.openei.org/s3_viewer?bucket=oedi-data-lake&prefix=ATB%2Felectricity%2Fcsv%2F2022%2F,,2020.0,Market,Advanced
 PHS,FOM,0.89,%/year,NREL/ATB-https://data.openei.org/s3_viewer?bucket=oedi-data-lake&prefix=ATB%2Felectricity%2Fcsv%2F2022%2F,,2020.0,Market,Conservative
@@ -3098,9 +3106,13 @@ SMR CC,capture_rate,0.9,per unit,"IEA Global average levelised cost of hydrogen
 SMR CC,efficiency,0.69,per unit (in LHV),"IEA Global average levelised cost of hydrogen production by energy source and technology, 2019 and 2050 (2020), https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-average-levelised-cost-of-hydrogen-production-by-energy-source-and-technology-2019-and-2050",,,,
 SMR CC,investment,605753.2171,EUR/MW_CH4,Danish Energy Agency,"Technology data for renewable fuels, in pdf on table 3 p.311",2015.0,,
 SMR CC,lifetime,30.0,years,"IEA Global average levelised cost of hydrogen production by energy source and technology, 2019 and 2050 (2020), https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-average-levelised-cost-of-hydrogen-production-by-energy-source-and-technology-2019-and-2050",,,,
-SOEC,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+SOEC,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Moderate
+SOEC,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Conservative
+SOEC,FOM,0.04,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Advanced
 SOEC,efficiency,0.82,p.u.,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
-SOEC,investment,1389.2004,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+SOEC,investment,1561.0,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Moderate
+SOEC,investment,2651.0,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Conservative
+SOEC,investment,785.0,USD/kW,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Advanced
 SOEC,lifetime,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
 Sand-charger,FOM,1.075,%/year,"Viswanathan_2022, NULL","{'carrier': ['elec', 'sand'], 'technology_type': ['charger'], 'type': ['thermal'], 'note': ['Guesstimate, 50% on charger']}",2020.0,,
 Sand-charger,efficiency,0.99,per unit,"Viswanathan_2022, p.107 (p.129)","{'carrier': ['elec', 'sand'], 'technology_type': ['charger'], 'type': ['thermal'], 'note': ['RTE assume 99% for charge and other for discharge']}",2020.0,,
@@ -3760,13 +3772,17 @@ digestible biomass to hydrogen,FOM,4.25,%/year,"Zech et.al. DBFZ Report Nr. 19.
 digestible biomass to hydrogen,capture rate,0.9,per unit,Assumption based on doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.01.006,,,,
 digestible biomass to hydrogen,efficiency,0.39,per unit,"Zech et.al. DBFZ Report Nr. 19. Hy-NOW - Evaluierung der Verfahren und Technologien für die Bereitstellung von Wasserstoff auf Basis von Biomasse, DBFZ, 2014",,,,
 digestible biomass to hydrogen,investment,4237.1194,EUR/kW_th,"Zech et.al. DBFZ Report Nr. 19. Hy-NOW - Evaluierung der Verfahren und Technologien für die Bereitstellung von Wasserstoff auf Basis von Biomasse, DBFZ, 2014",,2014.0,,
-direct air capture,FOM,1.3,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+direct air capture,FOM,1.3,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Moderate
+direct air capture,FOM,1.3,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Conservative
+direct air capture,FOM,1.3,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Advanced
 direct air capture,compression-electricity-input,0.15,MWh/tCO2,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_for_carbon_capture_transport_storage.xlsx",403.a Direct air capture,2020.0,,
 direct air capture,compression-heat-output,0.2,MWh/tCO2,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_for_carbon_capture_transport_storage.xlsx",403.a Direct air capture,2020.0,,
 direct air capture,electricity-input,0.24,MWh_el/t_CO2,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
 direct air capture,heat-input,1.17,MWh_th/t_CO2,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
 direct air capture,heat-output,1.25,MWh/tCO2,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_for_carbon_capture_transport_storage.xlsx",403.a Direct air capture,2020.0,,
-direct air capture,investment,11034260.0394,USD/t_CO2/h,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+direct air capture,investment,12398844.91,USD/t_CO2/h,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Moderate
+direct air capture,investment,19180739.93,USD/t_CO2/h,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Conservative
+direct air capture,investment,7103597.31,USD/t_CO2/h,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,R&D,Advanced
 direct air capture,lifetime,20.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_for_carbon_capture_transport_storage.xlsx",403.a Direct air capture,2020.0,,
 direct air capture,years,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
 direct firing gas,FOM,1.2121,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_for_industrial_process_heat.xlsx",312.a Direct firing Natural Gas:  Fixed O&M,2019.0,,
@@ -3829,7 +3845,7 @@ electrobiofuels,capture rate,0.9,per unit,Assumption based on doi:10.1016/j.biom
 electrobiofuels,efficiency-biomass,1.3183,per unit,Stoichiometric calculation,,,,
 electrobiofuels,efficiency-hydrogen,1.0309,per unit,Stoichiometric calculation,,,,
 electrobiofuels,efficiency-tot,0.6217,per unit,Stoichiometric calculation,,,,
-electrobiofuels,investment,1028678.3556,EUR/kW_th,combination of BtL and electrofuels,,2022.0,,
+electrobiofuels,investment,1155460.1124,EUR/kW_th,combination of BtL and electrofuels,,2022.0,,
 electrolysis,FOM,4.0,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",86 AEC 100 MW:  Fixed O&M ,2020.0,,
 electrolysis,efficiency,0.5773,per unit,"Danish Energy Agency, data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",86 AEC 100 MW:  Hydrogen Output,2020.0,,
 electrolysis,efficiency-heat,0.2762,per unit,"Danish Energy Agency, data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",86 AEC 100 MW:   - hereof recoverable for district heating,2020.0,,
@@ -3922,14 +3938,14 @@ hydro,investment,2574.060290445133,USD/kW,NREL/ATB-https://data.openei.org/s3_vi
 hydro,investment,2574.060290445133,USD/kW,NREL/ATB-https://data.openei.org/s3_viewer?bucket=oedi-data-lake&prefix=ATB%2Felectricity%2Fcsv%2F2022%2F,,2020.0,R&D,Conservative
 hydro,investment,2574.060290445133,USD/kW,NREL/ATB-https://data.openei.org/s3_viewer?bucket=oedi-data-lake&prefix=ATB%2Felectricity%2Fcsv%2F2022%2F,,2020.0,R&D,Moderate
 hydro,lifetime,80.0,years,IEA2010, from old pypsa cost assumptions,2015.0,,
-hydrogen storage compressor,FOM,4.0,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,-,2022.0,,
+hydrogen storage compressor,FOM,4.0,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
 hydrogen storage compressor,compression-electricity-input,0.05,MWh_el/MWh_H2,"Based on Stöckl et al (2021): https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.03464, table SI.4.",1.707 kWh/kg.,,,
-hydrogen storage compressor,investment,2.0291,USD/kWh_H2,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
-hydrogen storage compressor,lifetime,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,-,,,
-hydrogen storage tank type 1,FOM,4.0,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,-,2022.0,,
-hydrogen storage tank type 1,investment,15.0133,USD/kWh_H2,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
-hydrogen storage tank type 1,lifetime,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,-,,,
-hydrogen storage tank type 1,min_fill_level,6.0,%,"Based on Stöckl et al (2021): https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.03464, table SI.9.",-,,,
+hydrogen storage compressor,investment,2.28,USD/kWh_H2,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+hydrogen storage compressor,lifetime,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
+hydrogen storage tank type 1,FOM,4.0,%/year,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+hydrogen storage tank type 1,investment,16.87,USD/kWh_H2,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,2022.0,,
+hydrogen storage tank type 1,lifetime,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
+hydrogen storage tank type 1,min_fill_level,6.0,%,"Based on Stöckl et al (2021): https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.03464, table SI.9.",,,,
 hydrogen storage tank type 1 including compressor,FOM,1.0526,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_catalogue_for_energy_storage.xlsx",151a Hydrogen Storage - Tanks:  Fixed O&M,2015.0,,
 hydrogen storage tank type 1 including compressor,investment,60.3186,EUR/kWh,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_catalogue_for_energy_storage.xlsx",151a Hydrogen Storage - Tanks:  Specific investment,2015.0,,
 hydrogen storage tank type 1 including compressor,lifetime,25.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_catalogue_for_energy_storage.xlsx",151a Hydrogen Storage - Tanks:  Technical lifetime,2015.0,,