-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Proposal: Add ability to indicate profile or profiles on a STIX_Package
Status: Accepted
Comment Period Closes: 12/6/2013
Affects Backwards Compatibility: NO
Relevant Issue: https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/54
The STIX community has been discussing the concept of STIX profiles, which allow users to indicate how they use STIX (which portions they use, which extensions they use, etc.)
To date, however, there has been no mechanism for a STIX instance document to indicate which profile or profiles it is complying with.
This proposal suggests add a field to STIX_Header (within STIX_Package) to allow producers to indicate which profiles they are conforming to. The field would be implemented as a simple list of profile names, which as a suggested practice would take the form of a URI that includes the profile version. As an example:
<stix:STIX_Header>
<stix:Profiles>
<stix:Profile>http://stix.mitre.org/profiles#SimpleIndicatorSharing-1.0</stix:Profile>
</stix:Profiles>
</stix:STIX_Header>
There is no expected compatibility impact. Producers will have the option to use the profile specification field and consumers can choose to handle or not handle them as with any other field in STIX.
- Should this capability be added to STIX?
- Should it allow a reference to more than one profile?
- Is the suggested format correct? Should we add any other information, such as an explicit version number or a URL to the profile source?