-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #4814 - Correct lots of runway definitions #4815
Conversation
Just a preface: it is entirely possible that some parts of this PR are wrong, I haven't checked every file. If you find an issue (or worse, a string if issues), let me know and I'll sort it out. |
Already found some issues, I'll fix tomorrow morning. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you have removed all military airfield runways these are to be kept
Ahhhhh thats very annoying that they aren't covered my the EGTT/EGPX MATS c6, I'll go through manually and back all the ones that fulfil the requirements. |
Another question @Robbo599, many of the military aerodromes don't have their ATIS's defined when the aerodrome has an ATIS service, but the ATIS frequencies are outside of the normal vatsim VHF range. Should they be added or not? |
most military units use UHF freqs so can't be used on VATSIM so no point defining them. we have a few alternate VHF ones defined for the more commonly used airfields. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only looked at deletions - will need to go through the corrections separately.
This is gonna make the runway selector so much cleaner!
Shall we cover #4846 in this PR too? EDIT: Just saw someone has already claimed it, never mind. |
Co-authored-by: Peter Mooney <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Peter Mooney <[email protected]>
OK so just compilation errors now. The following need active runway definitions removing from https://github.com/VATSIM-UK/UK-Sector-File/blob/main/UK.rwy I think as their runways are no longer defined.
|
I didn't even know |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A P P R O V E D
Thanks @AliceFord
Thank god (thanks to you and the other reviewers as well) |
I think the Active_Runway.txt files are actually ignored by the compiler as far as I can tell and it just uses UK.rwy, perhaps another something to add to the look at list... |
nice work! |
Fixes #4814
Summary of changes
Screenshots (if necessary)