-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add benchmark for sending large WebSocket messages #9635
Conversation
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #9635 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #9635 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.64% 98.64%
=======================================
Files 114 114
Lines 35361 35372 +11
Branches 4191 4193 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 34882 34893 +11
Misses 321 321
Partials 158 158
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This reverts commit db92393.
Backport to 3.10: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #9638 🤖 @patchback |
(cherry picked from commit 23d2966)
Backport to 3.11: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #9639 🤖 @patchback |
(cherry picked from commit 23d2966)
…bSocket messages (#9639) Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]>
…bSocket messages (#9638) Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]>
SSIA
For validating if #9634 is a good idea or not