-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2024 Birthday Update #160
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
2024 Birthday Update #160
Conversation
thanks for the update. Do you know how much more disk space this PR would require in the git repo? Also I believe the gh-pages branch would need to be the target of the PR in order to update the web site, but the target of this PR is master. |
I think we merged into master last time we did this, but I'll double-check when I can get to a computer. You're right—the images are in fact the same. If I recall correctly, it's artifact of how pkgdown works. My guess: The R code run for the example code in each function is the same, but the resulting images' metadata are slightly different. So git discards old images for the new, even though they look the same. I'd be surprised if there's a significant total file size difference, but I'll take a look and report back. |
even if the total file size is the same before and after the PR, the total git repo size doubles ... |
Confirming that the files for the website are in fact merged into 'master'. Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean when you refer to the git repo size if you don't mean the file size. 😅 Given your concerns, let's hold off on this till someone (probably me 😛) strips the website from the main branch and sets up the GitHub actions to render the website. That way the website can be totally separate from |
Sorry, I should've asked if the suggested course of action is acceptable to you. You're the boss. My bad. Do you wanna keep the website updated (in a different branch) with GitHub actions instead of the manual process we current have? |
Given the new pull request, we can probably close this one? |
actually if the master branch is being used for deployment, this PR would be ok.
I do mean file size but of .git directory in addition to regular non-hidden files.
so pulling these new branches resulted in an increase of total size of .git dir from 125 to 190 megabytes. |
Oh, cool. Though this PR has been superseded by the Automatic Birthday Machine. As you know, this PR and the one last year rely on committing the website to the master branch; the Automatic Birthday Machine doesn't commit
I think the old branch relied on the master branch's I think. Embarrassingly, I didn't document anything related to GitHub's UI and now the Automatic Birthday Machine has overridden whatever UI settings were in place before. So what is the case now wasn't necessarily the case then.
Oh, I see. Neat! I learned something new and vague about how git works today. 😄 |
Website has been updated. It's one-year-old now!