Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix results didn't have same order as futures #173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

gabrielmbmb
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR fix a bug that was introduced in #164. The order of the results with respect of the futures was not being preserver in the when_all_complete function (kudos to @alvarobartt for spotting the issue).

@gabrielmbmb gabrielmbmb added this to the 0.2.0 milestone Dec 20, 2023
@gabrielmbmb gabrielmbmb self-assigned this Dec 20, 2023
Copy link
Member

@alvarobartt alvarobartt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! I've already verified that it works fine, thanks for the quick fix

image

@gabrielmbmb gabrielmbmb marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2023 15:01
@gabrielmbmb gabrielmbmb merged commit db50e58 into main Dec 20, 2023
4 checks passed
@gabrielmbmb gabrielmbmb deleted the fix_results_order_not_preserved branch December 20, 2023 15:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants