Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Undo move to pep440_rs 0.4.0. #624

Closed

Conversation

mostthingsweb
Copy link
Contributor

@mostthingsweb mostthingsweb commented Feb 9, 2024

pep508_rs 0.2.4 (which transitively depended on pep440_rs 0.4.0) was yanked, but poc-monotrail wasn't updated. So now things fail to build in a different way.

pep508_rs 0.2.4 (which transitively depended on pep440_rs 0.4.0) was yanked,
but poc-monotrail wasn't updated. So now things fail to build in a different way.
@cnpryer
Copy link
Contributor

cnpryer commented Feb 9, 2024

Maybe we can just bump it upstream (konstin/poc-monotrail#65) and move to 0.3.0 ourselves.

mitsuhiko added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
@mitsuhiko mitsuhiko mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2024
mitsuhiko added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
j178 pushed a commit to j178/rye that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants