-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(goal_planner): update lateral_deviation_thresh from 0.3
to 0.1
#9850
feat(goal_planner): update lateral_deviation_thresh from 0.3
to 0.1
#9850
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kasunori-Nakajima <[email protected]>
Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project! 🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode. Please ensure:
|
0.3
to 0.1
0.3
to 0.1
0.3
to 0.1
0.3
to 0.1
@Kazunori-Nakajima
And could you run evaluator? |
Signed-off-by: Kasunori-Nakajima <[email protected]>
Run evaluator test here(TIER IV Internal link) |
} | ||
|
||
bool hasDeviatedFromCurrentPreviousModulePath( | ||
bool hasDeviatedFromPath( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nits:
planner_data is too heavy to copy, and this function require only
planner_data.self_odometry->pose.pose.position.
so we can use
bool hasDeviatedFromPath(Point & ego_position,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Point is geometry mesgs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much! I see!
I fixed it.
Signed-off-by: Kasunori-Nakajima <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 29.58% 29.57% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 1451 1456 +5
Lines 108964 109027 +63
Branches 42615 42617 +2
==========================================
Hits 32240 32240
- Misses 73626 73689 +63
Partials 3098 3098
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Description
There was a lateral shift when the goal planner pathway started.
To reduce it, the value of lateral_deviation_thresh was changed from 0.3 to 0.1.
and minor refactroing by unifying similar functions
Related links
TIER IV Internal link
How was this PR tested?
Scenairo test in PSIM (I looked at the
/planning/planning_evaluator/metrics/lateral_tajectory_displacement_local/max
)1._pass.mp4
Notes for reviewers
None.
Interface changes
None.
Effects on system behavior
None.