Skip to content

Comparing fundamental differences across Closed Core vs. Open Core oriented companies

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

cossmedia/Closed-vs-Open-Core

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

2 Commits
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Closed (Source) Core Open (Source )Core
Company examples Facebook / Salesforce / Oracle / Twilio Liferay / Red Hat / Elastic / GitLab
Business models Many, often advertising, SaaS, cloud, etc. Many, often cloud serivces, value-added IP, insurance
Capitalism Shareholder-Oriented, Value-Capture Focused Stakeholder-Oriented, Value-Creation Focused
Category "SaaS" / "Cloud" COSS
Distribution Costly, Permissioned Free, Permissionless
Funding/Capitalization Largely Capital Intensive Highly Capital Efficient
GTM/Sales Top-Down-First (mostly), Community Exploitative Bottoms-Up-First, Community Nurturing
Hiring Geo-Concentrated / Office-First Geo-Distributed / Remote-First
Innovation Strategy Ivory Tower Often Disaggregated
Primary Output Distribution (1-to-N) Technology (0-to-1)
Software Licensing Fully Closed Core and Partially Open-Source Crust Open Source Core, Proprietary (not necesarrily Closed-Source) Crust
Patents Usually covered by a patent portfolio Rarely covered by a patent portfolio
Market dynamics Macro, Vulnerable, Push Micro, Secular, Pull
Marketing User = Lead, Funnel Modeling User != Lead, Ecosystem Modeling
Innovation Zero Sum, Trends towards homogeneity Positive Sum, Trends towards heterogeneity
Product development Single Roadmaps Dual/Multi Roadmaps
R&D Always Centralized Often decentralized at least in part
Tech/Company Relationship Core software/tech tightly coupled to company Core software/tech loosely (if at all) coupled to company

About

Comparing fundamental differences across Closed Core vs. Open Core oriented companies

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published