Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[21538] Allow all durability configurations #907

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Mario-DL
Copy link
Member

@Mario-DL Mario-DL commented Sep 12, 2024

Description

This PR documents the new behavior included in the implementation PR:

  • Allows the creation of a DataWriter/Reader with a PERSISTENT durability, but behaving as TRANSIENT (warning about it).
  • When in TRANSIENT, if no persistence guid is given, it fallbacks to TRANSIENT_LOCAL.

Related implementation PR:

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • Code snippets related to the added documentation have been provided.
  • Documentation tests pass locally.
  • N/A Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • CI passes without warnings or errors.

docs/fastdds/persistence/persistence.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/fastdds/dds_layer/core/policy/standardQosPolicies.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/fastdds/persistence/persistence.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany self-requested a review October 2, 2024 05:59
@Mario-DL Mario-DL requested review from MiguelCompany and removed request for MiguelCompany October 2, 2024 06:32
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany merged commit 782514c into master Oct 3, 2024
4 checks passed
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the feature/21538 branch October 3, 2024 08:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants