iox-#2377: Include <chrono> for system_clock

[LilyWangLL]

Notes for Reviewer

I am a member of Microsoft vcpkg, due to there are new changes merged by microsoft/STL#5105, which revealed a conformance issue in iceoryx. It must add include <chrono> to fix this error.

Compiler error with this STL change:

D:\b\iceoryx\src\v2.0.6-c8abea20ae.clean\iceoryx_platform\win\source\time.cpp(42): error C2039: 'system_clock': is not a member of 'std::chrono'

Pre-Review Checklist for the PR Author

1. Code follows the coding style of CONTRIBUTING.md
2. Tests follow the best practice for testing
3. Changelog updated in the unreleased section including API breaking changes
4. Branch follows the naming format (iox-123-this-is-a-branch)
5. Commits messages are according to this guideline
   • Commit messages have the issue ID (iox-#123 commit text)
   • Commit author matches Eclipse Contributor Agreement (and ECA is signed)
6. Update the PR title
   • Follow the same conventions as for commit messages
   • Link to the relevant issue
7. Relevant issues are linked
8. Add sensible notes for the reviewer
9. All checks have passed (except task-list-completed)
10. Assign PR to reviewer

Checklist for the PR Reviewer

• Consider a second reviewer for complex new features or larger refactorings
• Commits are properly organized and messages are according to the guideline
• Code according to our coding style and naming conventions
• Unit tests have been written for new behavior
• Public API changes are documented via doxygen
• Copyright owner are updated in the changed files
• All touched (C/C++) source code files from iceoryx_hoofs have been added to ./clang-tidy-diff-scans.txt
• PR title describes the changes

Post-review Checklist for the PR Author

1. All open points are addressed and tracked via issues

References

• Closes Fix windows performance issue #2377

[LilyWangLL]

Pinging @elfenpiff ...

I have signed the ECA, but I don't know why this PR show failed with the ECA check. Please let me know what I should do about this. Thanks in advance.

[elBoberido]

It might take a day until everything is synced. If the ECA still fails tomorrow, we need to investigate further.

As long as your commit have the same email address as set in the ECA, it should work once the servers are synced.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.69%. Comparing base (e693cc2) to head (22a4f5e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2378      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.70%   78.69%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         440      440              
  Lines       16981    16981              
  Branches     2361     2361              
==========================================
- Hits        13365    13364       -1     
  Misses       2736     2736              
- Partials      880      881       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	78.49% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests_timing	15.35% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[elfenpiff]

@LilyWangLL I restarted multiple times the ECA verification check and then checked to commit author:

From: LilyWangLL <4945507022qq.com>

You must use the same email address for signing the ECA and for every commit and 4945507022qq.com is not a valid email address.

You should be able to adjust the author by calling:

git commit --amend --author="Author Name <[email protected]>" --no-edit
git push -f --force-with-lease

[LilyWangLL]

@LilyWangLL I restarted multiple times the ECA verification check and then checked to commit author:

From: LilyWangLL <4945507022qq.com>

You must use the same email address for signing the ECA and for every commit and 4945507022qq.com is not a valid email address.

You should be able to adjust the author by calling:

git commit --amend --author="Author Name <[email protected]>" --no-edit
git push -f --force-with-lease

Thanks for your reply. I have updated this.