Test updated for Freelancer Rates: Corrects a invalid test

[fparadas]

This fixes one of freelancer rates test.

It was testing if a discount of 20% over a value of 1 was 1.2, the correct value should be 0.8.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to exercism/elixir 💜 🎉. This is an automated PR comment 🤖 for the maintainers of this repository that helps with the PR review process. You can safely ignore it and wait for a maintainer to review your changes.

Based on the files changed in this PR, it would be good to pay attention to the following details when reviewing the PR:

• General steps

  • 🏆 Does this PR need to receive a label with a reputation modifier (x:size/{tiny,small,medium,large,massive})? (A medium reputation amount is awarded by default, see docs)

• Any exercise changed

  • 👤 Does the author of the PR need to be added as an author or contributor in <exercise>/.meta/config.json (see docs)?
  • 🔬 Do the analyzer and the analyzer comments exist for this exercise? Do they need to be changed?
  • 📜 Does the design file (<exercise>/.meta/design.md) need to be updated to document new implementation decisions?

• Concept exercise changed

  • 🌲 Do prerequisites and practices in config.json need to be updated?
  • 📖 Does the concept introduction provide all necessary information to solve this exercise?

• Concept exercise tests changed

  • ⚪️ Are all tests un-skipped?
  • 🔢 Are all tests annotated with @tag task_id?
  • 🐈 Can all tests be understood by reading the test's block only (e.g. no module attributes, no setup functions)?

---

Automated comment created by PR Commenter 🤖.

[jiegillet]

I can't find an issue in this test.

budget = 480, hourly_rate = 60, discount = 20%
daily_rate = 8 * 60 = 480
daily_rate_with_discount = 480 - 20% = 384
days_in_budget = 480 / 384 = 1.25 (rounded to 1.2)

Can you point to the problem?

[fparadas]

You are correct, my bad