[flytectl] Use Protobuf Struct as dataclass Input for backward compatibility #5840
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tracking issue
#5318
Why are the changes needed?
If an old flytekit image receives BINARY MSGPACK Inputs, it will fail, since it can't interpret it.
Note: for the upcoming flytekit, we can use protobuf struct as input and still make dataclass/pydantic basemodel works well.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Generate JSON String instead of MSGPACK BYTES when using yaml dictionary as input to create dataclass.
How was this patch tested?
execute a pydantic workflow by using flytectl (yaml dictionary as input).
Setup process
Screenshots
Check all the applicable boxes
Related PRs
#5763