-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test modification of intermediate structural representations #3
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 80.95% 46.62% -34.34%
===========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 63 148 +85
===========================================
+ Hits 51 69 +18
- Misses 12 79 +67 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I think we should use SeqIO in the BioPython to extract sequences. And I think we should avoid using Biopandas if BioPython can do the job to keep the simplicity of the dependency. |
Motivation
These changes add analysis scripts and methods to test how alphafold outputs change when manipulating the intermediate structural representations during the recycling process.
See related PR changes in lbl-cbg/alphafold#1 and lbl-cbg/ColabFold#1 to run.
How to test the behavior?
metfish/data
folder.preprocess_conformer_pairs.py
to generate pdb, fasta, and pickle files to use as inputs to AF.colabfold_batch
with the following arguments to modify the intermediate structural representations.scripts/plot_conformer_pair_outcomes.ipynb
notebookChecklist
ruff
from the source directory.