Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Waku 2024 H2 Roadmap update #117
Waku 2024 H2 Roadmap update #117
Changes from 3 commits
63e148e
0ac0eae
be28f6b
181de72
e902f47
d323520
fe493b2
1605e20
dffa177
4903449
483a0a2
9cb09e2
eec362d
c1b4ed0
3629e4a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One more thing that may belong here is finishing the Waku Whitepaper. This would roughly take the entire Q4 (12w) to finish, but be something that all Research engineers will work on in parallel to their other deliverables (a few hours each week).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added to roadmap: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L8HvXtAYk-JqQL6w3RgCskXwegcTa0J5nyH9YL4LrQE/edit#heading=h.hejfvov7j7ux but as you say here, not much value to have it in Gantt chart.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This still seems mostly accurate except that we'll need a (significant) separate item for Store Sync. Reliability performance testing could also probably be more general.
I'd change it to:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are
rln v2
and API stabilization efforts for later?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! Fixed. Can you please help provide estimate for all js-waku items.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding!
Won't we have
API stabilization
as a separate work stream? Though we discussed it - it is vaguely defined as we don't have any backlog for it. We can add it at the end of H2 as well so not to overcommit.For estimates for
dogfooding
app I think8w
is good as it is aligned with beginning of Devcon.For
reliability
all good as per waku-org/pm#186 (comment)For
rln v2
- I think8w
is good estimate but I am not sure as for the scope (in my mind it seems quite straightforward to do) so if possible I'd add2w
on top, if no we can go with current and extend if it is needed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's continue the planning discussion in discord