-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
Issues: modelica/ModelicaSpecification
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Allow calling impure functions in clocked equations/statements
discussion
Indicates that there's a discussion; not clear if bug, enhancement, or working as intended
#3614
opened Nov 22, 2024 by
otronarp
Add author, copyright, and license annotations?
enhancement
New feature or request
#3611
opened Nov 12, 2024 by
casella
Stricter definition of numerics
discussion
Indicates that there's a discussion; not clear if bug, enhancement, or working as intended
Standardizing FMU-import
discussion
Indicates that there's a discussion; not clear if bug, enhancement, or working as intended
BaseModelica should be a proper subset of Modelica
MCP0031
Base Modelica and MLS modularization (MCP-0031)
#3569
opened Sep 10, 2024 by
christoff-buerger
How to represent final start when using fallback value?
MCP0031
Base Modelica and MLS modularization (MCP-0031)
#3560
opened Aug 12, 2024 by
henrikt-ma
Hierarchy of stream connectors.
clarification
Specification of feature is unclear, but not incorrect
#3551
opened Jul 16, 2024 by
qlambert-pro
Provide an explicit list of constructs which are legal in Base Modelica but not in Modelica
MCP0031
Base Modelica and MLS modularization (MCP-0031)
#3548
opened Jul 1, 2024 by
casella
BaseModelica prerelease suggestions
discussion
Indicates that there's a discussion; not clear if bug, enhancement, or working as intended
MCP0031
Base Modelica and MLS modularization (MCP-0031)
#3543
opened Jun 27, 2024 by
olivleno
Are discrete inputs allowed in Modelica?
clarification
Specification of feature is unclear, but not incorrect
#3527
opened Jun 10, 2024 by
casella
Notation used for function annotations will soon be obsolete
#3495
opened Mar 27, 2024 by
henrikt-ma
Define a verificationExperiment annotation for experiments meant to compare results for regression testing and cross-tool comparisons
discussion
Indicates that there's a discussion; not clear if bug, enhancement, or working as intended
enhancement
New feature or request
Implicit dv := pre(dv) in initial algorithm?
clarification
Specification of feature is unclear, but not incorrect
Keyword "inertial" for connector variable (ThermoFluidStream)
#3467
opened Jan 19, 2024 by
MarekMatejak
Can constants be used in graphical annotations?
clarification
Specification of feature is unclear, but not incorrect
discussion
Indicates that there's a discussion; not clear if bug, enhancement, or working as intended
Previous Next
ProTip!
Exclude everything labeled
bug
with -label:bug.