Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multi modification #3545
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Multi modification #3545
Changes from all commits
358e7b5
42f2618
cb23e50
136013d
c6e6987
d53d489
45bf28b
61369dd
6df6022
e07a37c
54eb45d
78a4de0
c9dfbbe
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is where I typed a comment before but it disappeared. Trying again. I don't find that "only conceptual" explains enough what is going on. Can we formulate it more concretely? From the example it looks like there is still some merging going on. Is it correct then to say that if a redeclaration is also replaceable but does not include its own constranedby-clause, a constrainedby-clause is created using the class specified in the previous constrainedby-clause and the modification added to it? This topic is one of those where I forget the all the minute details if I haven't looked at it in more than a week.