Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default Icon; more or less according to decision. #3624

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

HansOlsson
Copy link
Collaborator

Introducing a name for it to make it easier to refer to, and to break up the long sentence.
Closes #3613

Introducing a name for it to make it easier to refer to, and to break up the long sentence.
Closes modelica#3613
@HansOlsson HansOlsson changed the title More or less according to decision. Default Icon; more or less according to decision. Dec 9, 2024
chapters/annotations.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapters/annotations.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@henrikt-ma
Copy link
Collaborator

Introducing a name for it to make it easier to refer to, and to break up the long sentence. Closes #3613

Took me a while to find this rationale, but as explained above I'm not sure we should introduce a concept for this situation, and what I suggested is another way to break up the long sentence.

HansOlsson and others added 2 commits December 11, 2024 14:08
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before approving without a non-normative sentence like this,

That \lstinline!visible!-attributes are not regarded makes it possible to obtain an icon which only shows connectors by adding a dummy primitive with \lstinline!visible = false!.

I'd like to see a language group poll against adding it. Otherwise, I'll have a hard time explaining to my colleague why such a simple clarification could not be added.

Reviewing with Request changes while waiting for the outcome of the poll.

@HansOlsson HansOlsson added this to the 2025-January milestone Jan 8, 2025
@HansOlsson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Language group: Add that non-normative text.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

How to render component instances without an Icon annotation in diagrams
3 participants