Skip to content

Conversation

@flaviendelangle
Copy link
Member

@flaviendelangle flaviendelangle commented Nov 6, 2025

Extracted from #20051

All the changes on the package will be dropped since the code moves
But at least the doc generation won't move 👌

@flaviendelangle flaviendelangle self-assigned this Nov 6, 2025
@flaviendelangle flaviendelangle added type: enhancement It’s an improvement, but we can’t make up our mind whether it's a bug fix or a new feature. scope: tree view Changes related to the tree view. This includes TreeView, TreeItem. labels Nov 6, 2025
@mui-bot
Copy link

mui-bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Deploy preview: https://deploy-preview-20233--material-ui-x.netlify.app/

Bundle size report

Bundle Parsed size Gzip size
@mui/x-data-grid 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/x-data-grid-pro 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/x-data-grid-premium 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/x-charts 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/x-charts-pro 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/x-charts-premium 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/x-date-pickers 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/x-date-pickers-pro 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/x-tree-view 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/x-tree-view-pro 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)

Details of bundle changes

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 883cef3

@flaviendelangle flaviendelangle marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2025 11:12
Copy link
Contributor

@noraleonte noraleonte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks 🎉 🧹

@flaviendelangle flaviendelangle merged commit 63a6716 into mui:master Nov 6, 2025
21 checks passed
@flaviendelangle flaviendelangle deleted the tree-item-id branch November 6, 2025 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

scope: tree view Changes related to the tree view. This includes TreeView, TreeItem. type: enhancement It’s an improvement, but we can’t make up our mind whether it's a bug fix or a new feature.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants