-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
repl: runtime deprecate instantiating without new #54869
Conversation
bb00db5
to
ae8d325
Compare
ae8d325
to
7f70642
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #54869 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.43% 88.32% -0.11%
==========================================
Files 654 654
Lines 187662 187673 +11
Branches 36120 36044 -76
==========================================
- Hits 165955 165763 -192
- Misses 14948 15133 +185
- Partials 6759 6777 +18
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with updates to existing codebase. Example:
const repl = REPLServer({ |
CC @nodejs/repl |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need a documentation-only deprecation on this first and we need to get a sense of how impactful a runtime deprecation would be on the ecosystem here. Given the nature of the repl module, this would most likely lead to a fair bit of console output noise for modules that are using the repl and users may not actually be able to do anything about it. So let's be careful.
FWIW It has already been doc-deprecated (but very recently). |
7f70642
to
1ada6a0
Compare
@jasnell would you be opposed to landing this in v23 entirely-I'm happy to wait until v24? |
I prefer to wait |
Got it. While I'd prefer for this to release in v23, I respect your opinion. I'll look into other optimizations in the meantime. |
@nodejs/tsc per nodejs/Release#1034 My main question is: is this something that could happen in v23? Or should it wait (like @jasnell suggested)? |
I agree with James on this |
Let's give people some time to make arrangements, before polluting their console. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
I've added the blocked label, as this should go out with v24. @jasnell, Putting aside the 'dont release yet', could you re-review? |
4235f74
to
e9a2c30
Compare
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
1106f9b
to
1974e39
Compare
Hey, I assume this needs a new CI since there has been commits since the latest change, can someone start it? The CITGM shouldn't need a rerun tho (IIUC) |
Can someone restart the fialed build so this can land? Thanks! |
The CI is 📗, can this land 🚀? |
Commit Queue failed- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/54869 ✔ Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/54869 ----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------ Title repl: runtime deprecate instantiating without new (#54869) Author Aviv Keller <[email protected]> (@RedYetiDev) Branch RedYetiDev:repl-deprecate-2 -> nodejs:main Labels util, repl, semver-major, author ready, deprecations, needs-ci, needs-citgm, commit-queue-squash Commits 6 - repl: runtime deprecate instantiating without new - fixup! - fixup! fixup! - fixup! fixup! fixup! - fix flaky test - fixup! fix flaky test Committers 2 - RedYetiDev <[email protected]> - GitHub <[email protected]> PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54869 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> ------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------ PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54869 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ⚠ Commits were pushed since the last approving review: ⚠ - repl: runtime deprecate instantiating without new ⚠ - fixup! ⚠ - fixup! fixup! ⚠ - fixup! fixup! fixup! ⚠ - fix flaky test ⚠ - fixup! fix flaky test ℹ This PR was created on Mon, 09 Sep 2024 23:11:31 GMT ✔ Approvals: 4 ✔ - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54869#pullrequestreview-2383013809 ✔ - LiviaMedeiros (@LiviaMedeiros): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54869#pullrequestreview-2302928904 ✔ - Matteo Collina (@mcollina) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54869#pullrequestreview-2374242695 ✔ - Benjamin Gruenbaum (@benjamingr) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54869#pullrequestreview-2397344156 ✔ Last GitHub CI successful ℹ Last Full PR CI on 2024-11-03T06:43:31Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/63402/ ℹ Last CITGM CI on 2024-10-24T21:16:40Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/3494/ - Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/63402/ ✔ Last Jenkins CI successful -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ✔ Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncuhttps://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/11712304862 |
Landed in 0368f2f |
PR-URL: nodejs#54869 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#54869 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Followup #54842
This PR runtime-deprecates instantiating the REPL classes without the
new
keyword.