-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: increase spin for eventloop test on s390 #56228
Conversation
Does the test still fail without increasing the spin time? I wonder if anything has changed since the test was marked flaky. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #56228 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.54% 88.54%
=======================================
Files 657 657
Lines 190395 190395
Branches 36552 36555 +3
=======================================
+ Hits 168580 168581 +1
+ Misses 14993 14990 -3
- Partials 6822 6824 +2 |
@lpinca I had looked at the test code and nothing changed since the issue was opened. Here is a run on main - https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Stress/job/node-stress-single-test/550/ |
I was referring to the actual code being tested, but I see one failure in the stress test on main. |
Commit Queue failed- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/56228 ✔ Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/56228 ----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------ Title test: increase spin for eventloop test on s390 (#56228) Author Michael Dawson <[email protected]> (@mhdawson) Branch mhdawson:perftest-390 -> nodejs:main Labels test, needs-ci Commits 1 - test: increase spin for eventloop test on s390 Committers 1 - Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56228 Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/41286 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <[email protected]> ------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------ PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56228 Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/41286 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <[email protected]> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ℹ This PR was created on Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:55:35 GMT ✔ Approvals: 3 ✔ - Luigi Pinca (@lpinca): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56228#pullrequestreview-2496638593 ✔ - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56228#pullrequestreview-2500210441 ✔ - Marco Ippolito (@marco-ippolito) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56228#pullrequestreview-2502278882 ⚠ This PR has conflicts that must be resolved ✔ Last GitHub CI successful ℹ Last Full PR CI on 2024-12-12T17:37:56Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/64026/ - Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/64026/ ✔ Last Jenkins CI successful -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ✔ Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncuhttps://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/12337187281 |
This needs a rebase. |
It was excluded as it was failing intermittently. Likely that s390 was just so fast times were rounded down to 0. Increase the spin time on s390x only. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
f9562c9
to
6c7ffa1
Compare
Rebased |
It was excluded as it was failing intermittently. Likely that s390 was just so fast times were rounded down to 0. Increase the spin time on s390x only. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #56228 Refs: #41286 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <[email protected]>
Landed in be9dc2d |
It was excluded as it was failing intermittently. Likely that s390 was just so fast times were rounded down to 0.
Refs: #41286
Increase the spin time on s390x only.
Stress run of 1000 with no failures with this change - https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/nodes=rhel8-s390x/548/console