Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix lighthouse workflow #7361

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2024
Merged

chore: fix lighthouse workflow #7361

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

avivkeller
Copy link
Member

Can this be fast-tracked?

@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings December 27, 2024 12:36
@avivkeller avivkeller requested a review from a team as a code owner December 27, 2024 12:36
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 27, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 27, 2024 0:36am

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

@avivkeller avivkeller added the fast-track Fast Tracking PRs label Dec 27, 2024
@bmuenzenmeyer
Copy link
Collaborator

Fast track is OK with me

@AugustinMauroy
Copy link
Member

Okay for meee

Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Coverage Report

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 86%
84.47% (631/747) 65.37% (185/283) 83.91% (120/143)

Unit Test Report

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
137 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 5s ⏱️

@avivkeller avivkeller added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3cddcc8 Dec 27, 2024
23 checks passed
@avivkeller avivkeller deleted the fix/avivkeller/lighthouse branch December 27, 2024 13:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fast-track Fast Tracking PRs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants