Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document contracts' storage models #320

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2023

Conversation

cthulhu-rider
Copy link
Contributor

@cthulhu-rider cthulhu-rider commented Feb 1, 2023

  • alphabet
  • audit
  • balance
  • container
  • neofs
  • neofsid
  • netmap
  • nns
  • processing
  • proxy
  • reputation
  • subnet

@cthulhu-rider cthulhu-rider marked this pull request as draft February 1, 2023 15:00
@cthulhu-rider cthulhu-rider force-pushed the doc/storage-models branch 2 times, most recently from 5f66e92 to bbe1162 Compare February 2, 2023 09:53
@cthulhu-rider
Copy link
Contributor Author

storage scheme eased after #303, I'll redo all progress and finish

@cthulhu-rider
Copy link
Contributor Author

we have WIP related to NNS (#266, #267), so it's better to postpone scheme description for this contract

@cthulhu-rider cthulhu-rider marked this pull request as ready for review April 12, 2023 12:06
balance/doc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
audit/doc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
container/doc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
reputation/doc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
reputation/doc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
roman-khimov
roman-khimov previously approved these changes May 24, 2023
audit/doc.go Show resolved Hide resolved
neofsid/doc.go Show resolved Hide resolved
netmap/doc.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Add comments (outside godoc) with key-value storage scheme and
some explanations. The memory model will allow to more precisely
understand and migrate the contract storage.

Refs nspcc-dev#275

Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants