feat: App review in the "scan card"

[g123k]

Hi everyone,

We clearly need to improve our ratings in stores. As the release is approaching, this is just a baby step to better ask users to review the app.

A few things:

• We now count the number of scans (will be useful later)
• The review thing will have a 1/10 chance to appear after a valid scan
• I have created a better way to migrate user preferences (previously we only add a boolean to state if it was the first scan)
• With the "no" answer, we redirect to the form
• The code to check if the user still use "Smoothie" is removed
• The layout is tested on small devices

A video: Demo.webm

Some screenshots:

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #4450 (3bb4675) into develop (1c3921e) will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 21.01%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4450      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    10.17%   10.26%   +0.09%     
===========================================
  Files          295      296       +1     
  Lines        15087    15148      +61     
===========================================
+ Hits          1535     1555      +20     
- Misses       13552    13593      +41     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
...cards/product_cards/smooth_product_card_found.dart	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...kages/smooth_app/lib/helpers/analytics_helper.dart	6.45% <ø> (ø)
...smooth_app/lib/helpers/haptic_feedback_helper.dart	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...e_panel/knowledge_panels/knowledge_panel_card.dart	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...l/knowledge_panels/knowledge_panel_title_card.dart	0.00% <ø> (ø)
.../lib/knowledge_panel/knowledge_panels_builder.dart	0.00% <ø> (ø)
packages/smooth_app/lib/main.dart	12.90% <ø> (ø)
packages/smooth_app/lib/pages/image_crop_page.dart	0.99% <ø> (ø)
.../smooth_app/lib/pages/navigator/app_navigator.dart	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...p/lib/pages/onboarding/consent_analytics_page.dart	0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 31 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[github-actions]

You can test this PR on: Android

[teolemon]

You don't like (our>>the) app

[teolemon]

Just a small wording comment.

[g123k]

You don't like (our>>the) app

This is intended, but we can't revert if necessary.
The initial call to action is generic (the app), but when the user optsfor a negative feedback, it's a way to minimize their anger et have a better comment, then a generic "it's just shiit. it don't work blabla"

[teolemon]

Fair enough, let's see if that pans out