Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

crypto: testnet parameter setup tooling #1885

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 2, 2023
Merged

crypto: testnet parameter setup tooling #1885

merged 9 commits into from
Feb 2, 2023

Conversation

redshiftzero
Copy link
Member

@redshiftzero redshiftzero commented Jan 24, 2023

Closes #711

This adds two crates:

  • One in tools/parameter-setup that lets one generate (or regenerate) the parameters for the existing circuits. These parameters are then serialized to files in proof-params/src/gen/*.bin.
  • One in penumbra-proof-params that loads those parameters and deserializes them. This is the crate that would be a dependency added anywhere where we wish to create and verify proofs.

Note to the interested observer: this code and the generated parameters will only be used for development and testnet purposes. A different procedure will be used for mainnet (tracked in #712).

@redshiftzero redshiftzero changed the title wip: zk integration crypto: testnet parameter setup tooling Jan 25, 2023
@redshiftzero redshiftzero temporarily deployed to smoke-test January 30, 2023 17:16 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@redshiftzero redshiftzero temporarily deployed to smoke-test January 30, 2023 17:52 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@redshiftzero redshiftzero temporarily deployed to smoke-test January 30, 2023 18:31 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@redshiftzero redshiftzero marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2023 18:45
@redshiftzero redshiftzero temporarily deployed to smoke-test January 31, 2023 17:02 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@redshiftzero redshiftzero temporarily deployed to smoke-test February 1, 2023 21:00 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@conorsch
Copy link
Contributor

conorsch commented Feb 1, 2023

@redshiftzero I enabled ad-hoc runs of the container build story in 01ca799. Can you rebase this PR and try kicking off a run of that workflow on this branch?

@redshiftzero
Copy link
Member Author

@conorsch
Copy link
Contributor

conorsch commented Feb 1, 2023

Build succeeded! Looks like the lfs knobs you enabled in the workflow are indeed sufficient for the container story. I haven't pulled down that container and inspected it, but will take a look at preview once this lands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

commit proving and verification keys for dev/testnet purposes
2 participants