Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix return value is the function signature #174

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

Fix return value is the function signature #174

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a367fcb
fix return value matching the function signature
steffenix Aug 19, 2024
5a1397e
fix removed tool version
steffenix Sep 8, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion .tool-versions
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
erlang 25.0.2
elixir 1.14.0-otp-25
13 changes: 10 additions & 3 deletions lib/abi/type_decoder.ex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -151,9 +151,16 @@ defmodule ABI.TypeDecoder do

def decode(encoded_data, %FunctionSelector{returns: types, method_id: method_id}, :output)
when is_binary(method_id) do
case ABI.Util.split_method_id(encoded_data) do
{:ok, ^method_id, rest} -> decode_raw(rest, types)
_ -> decode_raw(encoded_data, types)
if rem(byte_size(encoded_data), 32) == 0 do
decode_raw(encoded_data, types)
else
case ABI.Util.split_method_id(encoded_data) do
{:ok, ^method_id, rest} ->
decode_raw(rest, types)
Comment on lines +158 to +159
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I actually have never seen the output of a call to include the method id. Is this even needed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@steffenix steffenix Sep 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the split method id can be removed yes, I thought you added It for a reason but if not it can be removed.


_ ->
decode_raw(encoded_data, types)
end
end
end

Expand Down
Loading