Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpx is added as an optional dependency #499

Merged

Conversation

Dibyendu-IITKGP
Copy link
Contributor

@Dibyendu-IITKGP Dibyendu-IITKGP commented Sep 12, 2024

Description

BPX 0.4.0 requires Pydantic<2. This causes conflict when I am trying to use Battery-Data_Toolkit.

Issue reference

Fixes #498

Review

Before you mark your PR as ready for review, please ensure that you've considered the following:

  • Updated the CHANGELOG.md in reverse chronological order (newest at the top) with a concise description of the changes, including the PR number.
  • Noted any breaking changes, including details on how it might impact existing functionality.

Type of change

  • New Feature: A non-breaking change that adds new functionality.
  • Optimization: A code change that improves performance.
  • Examples: A change to existing or additional examples.
  • Bug Fix: A non-breaking change that addresses an issue.
  • Documentation: Updates to documentation or new documentation for new features.
  • Refactoring: Non-functional changes that improve the codebase.
  • Style: Non-functional changes related to code style (formatting, naming, etc).
  • Testing: Additional tests to improve coverage or confirm functionality.
  • Other: (Insert description of change)

Key checklist:

  • No style issues: $ pre-commit run (or $ nox -s pre-commit) (see CONTRIBUTING.md for how to set this up to run automatically when committing locally, in just two lines of code)
  • All unit tests pass: $ nox -s tests
  • The documentation builds: $ nox -s doctest

You can run integration tests, unit tests, and doctests together at once, using $ nox -s quick.

Further checks:

  • Code is well-commented, especially in complex or unclear areas.
  • Added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • Checked that coverage remains or improves, and added tests if necessary to maintain or increase coverage.

Thank you for contributing to our project! Your efforts help us to deliver great software.

Copy link
Member

@BradyPlanden BradyPlanden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Dibyendu-IITKGP, please also include a breaking changelog entry, cheers!

pyproject.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.04%. Comparing base (8f222b7) to head (b587e58).
Report is 14 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #499   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.04%   99.04%           
========================================
  Files           52       52           
  Lines         3578     3578           
========================================
  Hits          3544     3544           
  Misses          34       34           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@BradyPlanden
Copy link
Member

Breaking changes would be my preference, as users now need to install with the optional bpx dependency to use that functionality.

@agriyakhetarpal
Copy link
Member

Any imports of bpx must also be guarded along with this change, so that import pybop does not break with having installed PyBOP without optional dependencies (e.g., pybop[bpx] and others).

@BradyPlanden
Copy link
Member

Thanks @agriyakhetarpal, how do you see this being guarded? This adds an expectation on the end user to add the optional dependency, is there an additional catch to add that provides a useful error message to users who haven't installed with the optional `bpx' dependency?

@agriyakhetarpal
Copy link
Member

Yes, @BradyPlanden, we'll have to document that PyBOP uses optional dependencies to handle certain operations (perhaps similar to https://docs.pybamm.org/en/latest/source/user_guide/installation/#dependencies, though it's a little tricky to manage because one forgets to update this page at times).

Yes, a useful error message is also nice to have; we have some guidelines on this in place, too: https://docs.pybamm.org/en/latest/source/user_guide/contributing.html#managing-optional-dependencies-and-their-imports. It works by handling imports using a programmatic importlib.import_module("modulename") pattern, instead of a import modulename statement and linking to the docs if the dependency isn't installed. It could also be useful to check out how pandas does this nowadays, since our implementation was quite inspired by them back when @arjxn-py implemented it!

Copy link
Member

@BradyPlanden BradyPlanden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating this @Dibyendu-IITKGP. A few suggestions on the documentation, otherwise looks good.

docs/installation.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/installation.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/installation.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pyproject.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/installation.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@BradyPlanden BradyPlanden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - thanks @Dibyendu-IITKGP

@BradyPlanden BradyPlanden merged commit 735cdd7 into develop Sep 28, 2024
31 checks passed
@BradyPlanden BradyPlanden deleted the 498-bug-move-bpx-to-an-optional-dependency-on-the-pybop branch September 28, 2024 10:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Move BPX to an optional dependency on the PyBOP
3 participants