PEP 621: Fix reference to canonical spec #3563
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vstinner
reviewed
Dec 5, 2023
jeanas
reviewed
Dec 5, 2023
brettcannon
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2023
This was referenced Dec 12, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The build has broken because PEP 621 uses intersphinx to refer to the canonical docs at https://packaging.python.org but they've re-organised things (pypa/packaging.python.org#1396) and deleted the old reference:
https://github.com/python/peps/actions/runs/7092751804/job/19304712978
I've opened pypa/packaging.python.org#1434 to add back the old reference, but let's also change it here, we can unblock our build quicker.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3563.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0621/