Re-spawn a process only if returncode != 0
#514
Conversation
lukicdarkoo
force-pushed
the
fix-respawn-returncode
branch
from
e47e56a
to
17ce532
Compare
Signed-off-by: Darko Lukic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Darko Lukic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Darko Lukic <[email protected]>
lukicdarkoo
force-pushed
the
fix-respawn-returncode
branch
from
e2d0885
to
8d38cbf
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lukicdarkoo I see you use respawn as means to retry on failure. I could argue that someone may want to use respawn to keep some process alive no matter what (current behavior in master), or to reset some process' state so long as it exits gracefully (opposite to the behavior in this patch).
With that in mind, I'd suggest we add support for a condition to respawn in addition to plain booleans, instead of hard-coding this check. @ivanpauno @wjwwood for feedback.
| @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ def generate_launch_description(): | |||
| return LaunchDescription([ | |||
|
|
|||
| ExecuteProcess( | |||
| cmd=[sys.executable, '-c', "print('action')"], | |||
| cmd=[sys.executable, '-c', "print('action'); false"], | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lukicdarkoo hmm, false is not a valid Python literal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably not the best way to make it crash :) I will change it
Signed-off-by: Darko Lukic <[email protected]>
lukicdarkoo
force-pushed
the
fix-respawn-returncode
branch
from
75d203f
to
108ad50
Compare
|
@lukicdarkoo have you considered:
? |
Sounds very good to me, but I understood that @ivanpauno and @wjwwood have to agree or contribute to the idea? |
Sounds fair, but how do you get the return code in the condition? |
Hmm. Didn't put a lot of thought to it. Temporarily pushing it to |
That works, but it's really weird IMO. |
Right, but that'd make it impossible to leverage the feature from non-Python launch files. I'm onboard with accepting callbacks for user convenience, but we have to accept a condition as well i.e. a construct that actually lives in |
|
Okay, pushing it to |
Same. |
|
@lukicdarkoo will you be moving forward with this? |
|
@lukicdarkoo friendly ping |
I believe there is a missing condition
returncode != 0when respawning a process. I have a process that finishes cleanly after a short time, but the launcher keeps respawning it. With the condition (returncode != 0) it works fine.