Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump framework; remove generic result type #15995

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

I see you updated files related to core. Please run pnpm changeset in the root directory to add a changeset as well as in the text include at least one of the following tags:

  • #added For any new functionality added.
  • #breaking_change For any functionality that requires manual action for the node to boot.
  • #bugfix For bug fixes.
  • #changed For any change to the existing functionality.
  • #db_update For any feature that introduces updates to database schema.
  • #deprecation_notice For any upcoming deprecation functionality.
  • #internal For changesets that need to be excluded from the final changelog.
  • #nops For any feature that is NOP facing and needs to be in the official Release Notes for the release.
  • #removed For any functionality/config that is removed.
  • #updated For any functionality that is updated.
  • #wip For any change that is not ready yet and external communication about it should be held off till it is feature complete.

🎖️ No JIRA issue number found in: PR title, commit message, or branch name. Please include the issue ID in one of these.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 20, 2025

AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

pavel-raykov
pavel-raykov previously approved these changes Jan 20, 2025
@jmank88 jmank88 force-pushed the rm-generic-result branch 2 times, most recently from ee936a7 to 4154bea Compare January 22, 2025 12:07
pavel-raykov
pavel-raykov previously approved these changes Jan 22, 2025
pavel-raykov
pavel-raykov previously approved these changes Jan 31, 2025
DylanTinianov
DylanTinianov previously approved these changes Feb 3, 2025
@jmank88 jmank88 dismissed stale reviews from DylanTinianov and pavel-raykov via d9da97d February 3, 2025 21:45
@jmank88 jmank88 force-pushed the rm-generic-result branch 7 times, most recently from 4096090 to bd4b7f5 Compare February 4, 2025 15:59
@jmank88 jmank88 marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2025 15:59
@jmank88 jmank88 requested review from a team as code owners February 4, 2025 15:59
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Flakeguard Summary

Ran new or updated tests between develop and 92e400f (rm-generic-result).

View Flaky Detector Details | Compare Changes

Found Flaky Tests ❌

1 Results
Name Pass Ratio Panicked? Timed Out? Race? Runs Successes Failures Skips Package Package Panicked? Avg Duration Code Owners
TestTxm_Reset 0.00% false false false 3 0 3 0 github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/v2/core/chains/evm/txmgr false 4.25s @smartcontractkit/bix-framework, @smartcontractkit/core

Artifacts

For detailed logs of the failed tests, please refer to the artifact failed-test-results-with-logs.json.

samsondav
samsondav previously approved these changes Feb 5, 2025
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ func NewTestEthBroadcaster(
// Mark instance as test
ethBroadcaster.XXXTestDisableUnstartedTxAutoProcessing()
servicetest.Run(t, ethBroadcaster)
time.Sleep(time.Second) // let background initiate
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

urgh, can we make this deterministic by waiting for a log message?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think waiting for .Ready() would be more robust, but it will require more changes and I didn't want this to snowball any more since it was incidental in this unrelated changeset. OK to follow up?
https://smartcontract-it.atlassian.net/browse/CRE-268

@jmank88 jmank88 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 8a1c5d5 Feb 6, 2025
187 of 190 checks passed
@jmank88 jmank88 deleted the rm-generic-result branch February 6, 2025 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants