Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RCAL-853: Give VA scale factor a reasonable default #396

Merged

Conversation

stscieisenhamer
Copy link
Collaborator

@stscieisenhamer stscieisenhamer commented Oct 3, 2024

WIP RCAL-853

Main PR: PR#1354

This PR gives the velocity_aberration.scale_facter meta a default working value of 1.0

Tasks

  • update or add relevant tests
  • update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page
  • Does this PR change any API used downstream? (if not, label with no-changelog-entry-needed)
    • write news fragment(s) in changes/: echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst (see below for change types)
    • start a romancal regression test with this branch installed ("git+https://github.com/<fork>/roman_datamodels@<branch>")
news fragment change types...
  • changes/<PR#>.feature.rst: new feature
  • changes/<PR#>.bugfix.rst: fixes an issue
  • changes/<PR#>.doc.rst: documentation change
  • changes/<PR#>.removal.rst: deprecation or removal of public API
  • changes/<PR#>.misc.rst: infrastructure or miscellaneous change

@stscieisenhamer stscieisenhamer changed the title Give VA scale factor a reasonable default RCAL-853: Give VA scale factor a reasonable default Oct 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.01%. Comparing base (087a60d) to head (65c7273).
Report is 77 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #396      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.56%   97.01%   -0.55%     
==========================================
  Files          30       37       +7     
  Lines        2788     3316     +528     
==========================================
+ Hits         2720     3217     +497     
- Misses         68       99      +31     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Collaborator

@schlafly schlafly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me but can you run regtests? I think those all basically pass through the metadata from the L1s and so probably aren't sensitive to this, but if they are we should know about it.

@stscieisenhamer stscieisenhamer force-pushed the rcal-853-velocity branch 2 times, most recently from 4f0c32a to 4f5d090 Compare November 15, 2024 20:28
@stscieisenhamer stscieisenhamer marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2024 21:23
@stscieisenhamer stscieisenhamer requested a review from a team as a code owner November 15, 2024 21:23
@stscieisenhamer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The doc issue must be something upstream. I can investigate or leave to others.

Copy link
Collaborator

@PaulHuwe PaulHuwe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stscieisenhamer stscieisenhamer merged commit 3fd2b3d into spacetelescope:main Nov 25, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants