Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check multiplicity argument passed to compilation script for HF numeric. #24

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 17, 2024

Conversation

gabrielasd
Copy link
Collaborator

Use the table of multiplicities for the isoelectronic series to verify the mult parameter in the run scripts.
The raw data from HF numeric calculations is only for the most stable electronic configuration of an atomic species. Without a check in the input multiplicity it was possible to assign the data to any electronic configuration of a given element and charge.
This solves the issue #11

gabrielasd and others added 2 commits February 7, 2024 16:27
Use the table of multiplicities for the isoelectronic series to verify
the mult parameter in the run scripts. The results from HF numeric
calculations are only for the most stable electronic configuration
of an atomic species.
@gabrielasd gabrielasd requested a review from msricher February 16, 2024 02:48
Copy link
Collaborator

@msricher msricher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this is ok to me.

Can we compare my MULTIPLICITIES table against another source, for the ground state multiplicities? We should at least be sure that that table is correct. I got it from Derrick's HDF5 file.

@gabrielasd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gabrielasd commented Feb 17, 2024

@msricher thanks for the feedback.

I'll add you comment about checking those values to issue #5 so that I don't forget about it.

@gabrielasd gabrielasd closed this Feb 17, 2024
@gabrielasd gabrielasd reopened this Feb 17, 2024
@gabrielasd gabrielasd merged commit 9f2c80f into master Feb 17, 2024
1 check failed
@gabrielasd gabrielasd deleted the numeric_db_mult branch April 18, 2024 16:01
msricher pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
…ic. (#24)

* Catch incorrect multiplicities passed when compiling numeric dataset.

Use the table of multiplicities for the isoelectronic series to verify
the mult parameter in the run scripts. The results from HF numeric
calculations are only for the most stable electronic configuration
of an atomic species.

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
msricher pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
…ic. (#24)

* Catch incorrect multiplicities passed when compiling numeric dataset.

Use the table of multiplicities for the isoelectronic series to verify
the mult parameter in the run scripts. The results from HF numeric
calculations are only for the most stable electronic configuration
of an atomic species.

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
marco-2023 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
…ic. (#24)

* Catch incorrect multiplicities passed when compiling numeric dataset.

Use the table of multiplicities for the isoelectronic series to verify
the mult parameter in the run scripts. The results from HF numeric
calculations are only for the most stable electronic configuration
of an atomic species.

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants