Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Boundary model for open boundaries #577

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

LasNikas
Copy link
Collaborator

@LasNikas LasNikas commented Jul 16, 2024

This PR basically outsources the evaluation of the characteristic variables in a separate file.
Also, it allows to specify different boundary models for the OBC.

I will create another PR (#574) in which I add the BoundaryModelTafuni

test/systems/open_boundary_system.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@LasNikas LasNikas requested a review from efaulhaber July 18, 2024 13:48
src/visualization/write2vtk.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@LasNikas LasNikas requested a review from svchb July 18, 2024 14:13
svchb
svchb previously approved these changes Jul 18, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 74.19355% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (main@b3219cb). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files Patch % Lines
...oundary/open_boundary/method_of_characteristics.jl 73.03% 24 Missing ⚠️
src/schemes/boundary/open_boundary/system.jl 83.33% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/visualization/write2vtk.jl 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #577   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   69.73%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       76           
  Lines           ?     4573           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     3189           
  Misses          ?     1384           
  Partials        ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 69.73% <74.19%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@svchb svchb enabled auto-merge (squash) July 19, 2024 10:54
@svchb svchb merged commit a676f52 into trixi-framework:main Jul 19, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants