-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add UUPS for core contracts #774
Comments
/start |
Tips:
|
Do you have any updates @Keyrxng? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment |
chill my friend |
Do you have any updates @Keyrxng? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment |
@Keyrxng - Releasing the bounty back to dev pool because the allocated duration already ended! |
@Keyrxng The time limit for this bounty is on Thu, 07 Sep 2023 08:49:39 UTC |
@Keyrxng - Releasing the bounty back to dev pool because the allocated duration already ended! |
@Keyrxng The time limit for this bounty is on Thu, 07 Sep 2023 08:50:02 UTC |
@Keyrxng - Releasing the bounty back to dev pool because the allocated duration already ended! |
@Keyrxng I don't know why the bot refuses to assign you to the issue, pls try with the |
/start |
Tips:
|
There's a linked PR, why the bot isn't picking up? |
Hard to say, ubiquity/ubiquibot#729 |
the bot is a rebel |
it looks like keyring it's gonna have this one, albeit it still need more work, let's see |
Do you have any updates @Keyrxng? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment |
New review requested |
Task Assignee Reward[ CLAIM 200 WXDAI ]
If you've enjoyed your experience in the DevPool, we'd appreciate your support. Follow Ubiquity on GitHub and star this repo. Your endorsement means the world to us and helps us grow!We are excited to announce that the DevPool and UbiquiBot are now available to partners! Our ideal collaborators are globally distributed crypto-native organizations, who actively work on open source on GitHub, and excel in research & development. If you can introduce us to the repository maintainers in these types of companies, we have a special bonus in store for you! |
Task Creator Rewardrndquu: [ CLAIM 114.4 WXDAI ] |
@molecula451 did not receive comment incentives here. Does anybody know why? Hard to tell from my phone perhaps the config is disabled? @0xcodercrane can you check the logs in Supabase? @ubiquity/software-development RFC |
/query @molecula451 |
@molecula451's wallet address is 0x4D0704f400D57Ba93eEa88765C3FcDBD826dCFc4 and multiplier is 1 |
/query @molecula451 molecula451 |
Invalid syntax for query command |
Original discussion
Right now we use the diamond proxy pattern for most of our contracts (implemented as diamond facets).
We also have the core contracts that can't be used with the diamond proxy because of function clashing. Hence the different upgradability pattern should be used.
What should be done:
P.S. Although CreditClock exists in the "core" folder it is not a "core" contract. We have plans for moving it to diamond facets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: