Fixed drive action #355
Fixed drive action #355
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to two workflow files, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
Line range hint
87-99: Well-designed workflow communication pattern.The implementation of PR ID passing between workflows through artifacts is a robust solution for cross-workflow communication. This pattern ensures that the drive workflow can correctly identify and handle PR-specific actions, addressing the core issue where the drive action was failing during merges.
A few architectural benefits of this approach:
- Clear separation of concerns between build and drive workflows
- Reliable PR context sharing using GitHub's artifact system
- Proper cleanup with the 1-day retention period
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
90-90: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:6: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/drive.yml (4)
Line range hint
24-43: LGTM! Consider enhancing the error message.The conditional check
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'correctly fixes the workflow failure during merges by ensuring PR ID artifact is only downloaded during pull request events.Consider making the error message more descriptive:
- core.setFailed('No pr_id artifact found from the build workflow'); + core.setFailed('No pr_id artifact found from the build workflow. This is expected for non-PR events.');
Line range hint
55-63: Fix incorrect variable name in error message.The error message references a non-existent variable
prIdContentinstead ofissue_number.Apply this fix:
let issue_number = fs.readFileSync('./pr_id'); if (!issue_number || isNaN(Number(issue_number))) { - core.setFailed(`Invalid PR ID: ${prIdContent}`); + core.setFailed(`Invalid PR ID: ${issue_number}`); return; }
Line range hint
77-102: Add error handling for JSON operations.While the conditional check fixes the merge issue, the script should handle potential JSON-related errors gracefully.
Consider adding error handling:
const fs = require('fs'); - // read the simulation results - const results = fs.readFileSync('./simulation_results.json', 'utf8'); - let resultsJson = JSON.parse(results); + try { + // read the simulation results + const results = fs.readFileSync('./simulation_results.json', 'utf8'); + let resultsJson = JSON.parse(results); + + // validate expected structure + if (!resultsJson.values || !resultsJson.labels || + !Array.isArray(resultsJson.values) || + !Array.isArray(resultsJson.labels)) { + throw new Error('Invalid simulation results structure'); + } + + // rest of the code... + } catch (error) { + core.setFailed(`Failed to process simulation results: ${error.message}`); + return; + }
Line range hint
1-20: Consider adding workflow documentation.The workflow successfully handles both PR and non-PR events, but could benefit from documentation explaining:
- Expected artifact structure
- Different execution paths (PR vs non-PR)
- Self-hosted runner requirements
Add a comment block at the top of the file:
name: Evaluate agent +# This workflow evaluates the agent by running simulations and handles results differently for PR and non-PR events: +# - For PRs: Downloads PR ID, runs simulation, and posts results as PR comments +# - For other events (e.g., merges): Only runs simulation +# +# Required artifacts from build workflow: +# - pr_id: Text file containing PR number (only for PR events) +# +# Required runner capabilities: +# - Docker with compose +# - X server for rendering on: workflow_run:
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/drive.yml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/build.yml
90-90: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:6: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
Line range hint
95-99: Verify artifact handling in drive workflow.The PR ID artifact upload looks good. Let's verify that the corresponding download step in drive.yml correctly handles this artifact.
✅ Verification successful
PR ID artifact handling is correctly implemented in drive workflow
The drive workflow correctly downloads and handles the PR ID artifact using a more robust approach with
actions/github-script@v6. The workflow:
- Downloads the artifact using GitHub API
- Unzips the artifact
- Validates the PR ID content
- Uses the PR ID to post simulation results as comments
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that drive.yml has corresponding download steps for the PR ID artifact # Test: Check for artifact download step in drive.yml # Expect: Should find matching download step with same artifact name rg -A 5 'actions/download-artifact@v[0-9]' .github/workflows/drive.yml rg 'name: pr_id' .github/workflows/drive.ymlLength of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first check if drive.yml exists and see its content fd -e yml -e yaml "drive" .github/workflows/ # If drive.yml doesn't exist, let's check all workflow files for artifact download fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec cat {} \;Length of output: 9511
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
90-90: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:6: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/drive.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-102: Verify workflow structure and dependencies.The changes correctly fix the drive action failure during merges by making PR-specific steps conditional. Let's verify the complete workflow structure and dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Workflow changes are properly structured and dependencies are verified
The verification confirms:
- The workflow is correctly triggered by "Build and push image" workflow
- PR ID artifact is properly created in the build workflow
- All PR-specific steps are consistently conditioned with
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify workflow structure and dependencies # Test 1: Verify this workflow is properly triggered echo "Checking workflow triggers..." rg -l "workflow_run:.*Build and push image" .github/workflows/ # Test 2: Check for corresponding build workflow that provides PR ID echo "Checking for PR ID artifact creation in build workflow..." rg "pr_id" .github/workflows/build.yml # Test 3: Verify all PR-specific steps are properly conditioned echo "Verifying PR-specific conditions..." rg "if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'" .github/workflows/drive.ymlLength of output: 708
| if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' | ||
| env: | ||
| PR_ID: ${{ github.event.number }} | ||
| run: | | ||
| mkdir -p ./pr | ||
| echo $PR_ID > ./pr/pr_id | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Quote the PR_ID variable in the shell command.
The shell command should quote the PR_ID variable to prevent word splitting and ensure proper handling of special characters.
Apply this diff to fix the shell command:
run: |
mkdir -p ./pr
- echo $PR_ID > ./pr/pr_id
+ echo "$PR_ID" > ./pr/pr_id📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' | |
| env: | |
| PR_ID: ${{ github.event.number }} | |
| run: | | |
| mkdir -p ./pr | |
| echo $PR_ID > ./pr/pr_id | |
| if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' | |
| env: | |
| PR_ID: ${{ github.event.number }} | |
| run: | | |
| mkdir -p ./pr | |
| echo "$PR_ID" > ./pr/pr_id |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
90-90: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:6: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Description
Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.
Fixes #354
Type of change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No.
Most important changes
Which files functionalities are most important in this PR. On which part should the reviewer be focussed on?
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes