-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add PetabProblem class for handling PEtab-defined simulation con… #2255
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2255 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 77.04% 77.16% +0.11%
===========================================
Files 92 94 +2
Lines 14987 15085 +98
===========================================
+ Hits 11547 11640 +93
- Misses 3440 3445 +5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
…ditions Makes it a bit easier to work with PEtab problems interactively or when implementing some PEtab-based objective function (AMICI-dev#962).
596a372
to
f2f0d12
Compare
2a4d2ab
to
9ab1463
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
"scaled_parameters=True in combination with default " | ||
"parameters is not implemented yet." | ||
) | ||
scaled_parameters = False |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
remove?
from .parameter_mapping import create_parameter_mapping | ||
|
||
|
||
class PetabProblem: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is codecov not reporting any coverage here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops. Because I started putting tests in a separate PEtab directory which was not included in the pytest invocation.
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fröhlich <[email protected]>
…ditions
Makes it a bit easier to work with PEtab problems interactively or when implementing some PEtab-based objective function (#962).