node version changed to "22.x" for compatability

[gautam-divyanshu]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Issue Number:

Fixes #

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

• I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
• I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
• I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

• I have written tests for all new changes/features
• I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
• I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions workflow Node.js version specification to use standard version format (22.x)

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a minor update to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file .github/workflows/pull-request.yml. Specifically, the change modifies the node-version specification in the Test-Docusaurus-Deployment job from node-version: 22 to node-version: '22.x'. This adjustment standardizes the version format to allow for potential minor version updates within the 22.x range, while maintaining the overall workflow structure and functionality.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml	Updated Node.js version specification from 22 to '22.x' in Test-Docusaurus-Deployment job

Possibly related PRs

• Added GitHub PR Workflow Check: Talawa Admin app starts (No Docker) #2452: Adds a new job to the same .github/workflows/pull-request.yml file
• fix failing workflow of TS compilation #2472: Updates the workflow file with changes affecting workflow logic
• Added Merge Conflict Check #3138: Introduces a new job in the .github/workflows/pull-request.yml file

Suggested reviewers

• palisadoes
• AVtheking

Poem

🐰 A workflow tweak, so subtle and light,
Node version dancing with version's might
From 22 to 22.x we leap
Flexibility's path, we softly creep
GitHub Actions, our rabbit's delight! 🚀

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 334f0f7 and c9e0116.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• .github/workflows/pull-request.yml

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)

• GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
• GitHub Check: Test Application
• GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.99%. Comparing base (334f0f7) to head (c9e0116).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3284       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage              8.56%   89.99%   +81.43%     
=====================================================
  Files                   309      330       +21     
  Lines                  7954     8519      +565     
  Branches               1763     1884      +121     
=====================================================
+ Hits                    681     7667     +6986     
+ Misses                 7196      598     -6598     
- Partials                 77      254      +177     

Flag	Coverage Δ
combined	89.99% <ø> (?)
jest	8.56% <ø> (?)
vitest	89.99% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[gautam-divyanshu]

@tasneemkoushar @palisadoes please merge this pr.

[gautam-divyanshu]

test deployment is not working bcz of this.