Add ENA-required submission acknowledgements to our submission acknowledgements

[anna-parker]

resolves ##2297

preview URL: https://clarify-submission.loculus.org/

Information about ENA submission in pathoplexus/pathoplexus#47

Summary

Add an additional checkbox which includes promises made to ENA:

Screenshot

[theosanderson]

Thanks for this!! A few thoughts:

• All Pathoplexus sequences reach INSDC so any terms that are inspired by INSDC should not be restricted to Open data terms. We should secondly avoid this to avoid confusing users: the data use terms question should be specifically about "How do you want your data used?" rather than confirming things about your sample. If we need people to do the latter, that should be a subsequent question. If we do this at all, then IMO it should be either part of the existing checkbox in the "Acknowledgement" section, or a second checkbox in that section.
• Whenever we add checkboxes we should carefully consider if they are definitely needed: it's easy to add overhead that ultimately damages the experience. These conditions already exist as part of our terms of use. Does this checkbox exist as part of the ENA submission process for users not using Pathoplexus? We could also consider making this checkbox part of group creation.
• I'm not sure if the info button on the Institution is needed. We've already made clear this data is publicly available, and made clear that sequences are submitted to INSDC. IMO that's enough to infer that the Institution will likely be submitted to INSDC along with everything else about the sequence. If we do have this, I think it would be better as a tooltip than something that needs a click.

[anna-parker]

Good points!

1. We need to add a page for https://main.loculus.org/docs/concepts/insdc-submission anyways (see [FEAT] Optimize image sizes pathoplexus/pathoplexus#41) -> so maybe we should just add the additional information about center name there. I just think that for submission this is quite important (if we somehow disappear users can still claim their data on INSDC - but the process kinda depends on groups being able to confirm their identity -> that is typically done with center name we were told.
2. I will move the additional ENA acknowledgements to another check box!

[theosanderson]

(I pushed a small tweak to spacing as it was hard to make as a "suggestion" due to it involving code not directly edited in this PR, hope that's OK)

[theosanderson]

This is great - made two more small changes - feel free to disagree with either. Thanks a lot!