enhanced simularium url and firebase recipe path validation

[rugeli]

Problem

What is the problem this work solves, including

1. query parameters such as AWSAccessKeyId were not being stripped from the url when opening in a new tab
2. closes validate firebase recipe packing paths with explicit error messaging #212

Solution

What I/we did to solve this problem

• removed query params from the url not only in firebase but also when opening a new tab
• a new field has been added to recipes/ in firebase, making it easier to copy the firebase recipe path for packing

• enhanced validation for the input path to check each part of the path and provided with corresponding error messages

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Steps to Verify:

We have tested several cases:

• fetching a recipe from an incorrect database (e.g. uploading recipe A to dev but fetching it from staging)
• misnaming any part of the path including database name, collection name or recipe id

some of the expected behaviors:

• run pack -r wrong_db_name:recipes/one_sphere_v_1.0.0, get error:

• run pack -r firebase:wrong_collection_name/one_sphere_v_1.0.0, get error:

• run pack -r firebase:recipes/wrong_id or choosing the wrong database, get error:

[github-actions]

Packing analysis report

Analysis for packing results located at cellpack/tests/outputs/test_spheres/spheresSST

Ingredient name	Encapsulating radius	Average number packed
ext_A	25	236.0

Packing image

Distance analysis

Expected minimum distance: 50.00
Actual minimum distance: 50.01

Ingredient key	Pairwise distance distribution
ext_A

[mogres]

Looks good!

[mogres]

Nice!

[meganrm]

I might push this into the the create_presigned_url function so the function returns a url that the next function knows it can use without any adjustments. I also think this is a good bug for some tests. Ie make a list of urls that you know would be a problem and make sure we catch all of them.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.75%. Comparing base (72ecf15) to head (d4ce342).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #230      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.63%   98.75%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          18       19       +1     
  Lines         511      563      +52     
==========================================
+ Hits          504      556      +52     
  Misses          7        7              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rugeli]

@meganrm @mogres
Recent changes since the last review:

• added function is_url_valid within AWSHandler class
• added a new test file: cellpack/tests/test_aws_handler.py

[mogres]

Thanks for adding tests!