Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

request/response finding pattern fix #1448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

future-pirate-king
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve enhancements to the vulnerability detection logic in the app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts file, including an updated regex pattern and a parameter name change for clarity. Structural improvements were made to Handlebars templates, new getter methods were added in TypeScript, and new entries for localization were introduced in both English and Japanese translation files. Additionally, error handling and asynchronous data fetching were improved in the PublicApiDocsComponent, along with updates to clipboard functionality in the code box component.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts isVulnerableApiFinding: Updated regex pattern; splitVulnerableApiFindingIntoBlocks: Changed parameter name from report to content. New type VulnerabilityApiFindingSection added.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs Structural modifications for improved readability and maintainability of the Handlebars template.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts Introduced new getter methods: isResponseBodyEmpty, isRequestCookiesEmpty, and isResponseCookiesEmpty. Enhanced URL retrieval logic.
app/components/public-api-docs/index.ts Added error handling and improved asynchronous data fetching using waitForPromise.
translations/en.json Added new entries for "requestCookies", "responseBody", and "responseCookies" for English localization.
translations/ja.json Added new entries for "requestCookies" and "responseBody" for Japanese localization.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.hbs Updated data-clipboard-target and id attributes to use dynamic values for improved functionality.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts Introduced new computed property copyTargetId for dynamic ID generation.
app/components/security/analysis-details/findings/add-form/index.ts Enhanced processing of finding.description to replace newline sequences for better formatting.

Possibly related PRs

  • Account Settings MFA Global CSS Migration #1452: The changes in the _component-variables.scss file are related to the main PR as both involve enhancements to CSS variables, specifically for styling elements related to vulnerability analysis and account settings security.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
With regex bright, dispelling gloom.
Content flows, a clearer stream,
Detecting flaws, a coder's dream!
Hops of joy, we celebrate,
For better code, we elevate! 🌼

Tip

New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

  • Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

  • Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5064f9f and 60e682f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2)

77-78: LGTM!

The updated regex pattern improves the specificity and robustness of the vulnerability detection logic by capturing a wider range of severity levels, confidence levels, and HTTP methods. The changes look good and do not introduce any correctness issues or breaking changes.


118-123: LGTM!

The parameter name change from report to content improves clarity regarding the function's purpose. It enhances the readability of the code without altering the functionality. The change looks good.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Deploying irenestaging with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 77647c8
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://84d140a1.irenestaging.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://req-res-finding-fix.irenestaging.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link

cypress bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Irene    Run #445

Run Properties:  status check failed Failed #445  •  git commit bdff168515 ℹ️: Merge 60e682f564e993604e605a93d086620a4b1d9f3b into 5064f9f9fada86090e78415f2b07...
Project Irene
Branch Review req-res-finding-fix
Run status status check failed Failed #445
Run duration 05m 00s
Commit git commit bdff168515 ℹ️: Merge 60e682f564e993604e605a93d086620a4b1d9f3b into 5064f9f9fada86090e78415f2b07...
Committer Sam David
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 1
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 9
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Tests for review

Failed  cypress/tests/dynamic-scan.spec.ts • 1 failed test

View Output

Test Artifacts
Dynamic Scan > it tests dynamic scan for an apk file: 58062 Test Replay Screenshots

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60e682f and 776c702.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 776c702 and b2e0ced.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2)

77-88: LGTM!

The updated regex pattern enhances the vulnerability detection logic by capturing specific severity levels, confidence levels, and HTTP methods. The changes are well-implemented and should work as intended.


132-133: LGTM!

The parameter name change from report to content improves the clarity and readability of the code. The changes are well-implemented and do not alter the functionality.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2e0ced and c532a36.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2)

77-88: LGTM!

The updated regex patterns for severity, confidence, and method make the vulnerability detection more robust by capturing specific values. The patterns are correctly constructed and should work as intended.


128-133: LGTM!

The parameter name change from report to content improves clarity regarding the function's purpose and does not alter the functionality.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c532a36 and 84b04d7.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (3 hunks)
  • translations/en.json (1 hunks)
  • translations/ja.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • translations/en.json
Additional comments not posted (12)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.scss (1)

17-25: LGTM!

The new CSS class .analysis-overridded-passed enhances the visual representation of elements that have passed analysis. The styles improve the clarity and usability of the component by visually distinguishing passed analyses from others. The changes are self-contained within the component's SCSS file and do not affect other parts of the codebase.

app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (1)

70-74: LGTM!

The new isResponseBodyEmpty getter method looks good:

  • It correctly checks for both an empty string and a string containing two single quotes, which is a common representation of an empty string in some contexts.
  • The method name accurately describes its purpose.
  • The method is concise and easy to understand.
  • The method is consistent with the existing code style and conventions.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (5)

2-26: LGTM!

The code changes enhance the readability and maintainability of the template by simplifying the rendering logic and removing redundant conditional checks.


27-44: LGTM!

The code changes improve the logical flow of the template while preserving the original functionality.


46-55: LGTM!

The code segment follows the established pattern for rendering request details.


57-64: LGTM!

The code segment follows the established pattern for rendering request details.


66-92: LGTM!

The code segment follows the established pattern for rendering response details.

app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2)

77-88: LGTM!

The updated regex patterns improve the specificity of vulnerability detection by capturing specific severity levels, confidence levels, and HTTP methods. The changes are correctly implemented.


128-133: LGTM!

The parameter name change from report to content improves clarity regarding the function's purpose. The changes are correctly implemented.

app/styles/_component-variables.scss (2)

1005-1007: Looks good to me!

The new CSS variable --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-vulnerable-api-marked-passed-code-background-color is added to define the background color for marked passed code in the vulnerable API findings section. The value is set to --neutral-grey-50, which seems appropriate.


1008-1010: Looks good to me!

The new CSS variable --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-vulnerable-api-border-color is added to define the border color for the vulnerable API findings section. The value is set to --border-color-1, which maintains consistency with other border colors.

translations/ja.json (1)

1206-1206: LGTM!

The addition of the Japanese translation for "responseBody" looks good. It will help localize that string for Japanese-speaking users.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 84b04d7 and 6be02b0.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (3 hunks)
  • translations/en.json (1 hunks)
  • translations/ja.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.scss
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
  • translations/en.json
  • translations/ja.json
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2)

77-88: LGTM!

The updated regex pattern improves the specificity of vulnerability detection by capturing specific severity levels, confidence levels, and HTTP methods. The regex pattern is correctly constructed and should work as intended.


128-133: LGTM!

The parameter name change from report to content improves clarity regarding the function's purpose. The function implementation is correct and should work as intended.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6be02b0 and dfe1e3a.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (11 hunks)
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs
Additional comments not posted (9)
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (9)

26-30: Refactor: Improved type definition for nested keys.

The new NestedKeyOf type definition enhances the flexibility and clarity of accessing nested properties within objects. This change is a significant improvement over the previous VulnerableApiFindingSection type, as it allows for recursive property access which is more suitable for the complex structures handled in this file.


69-107: Refactor: Enhanced logic for updating sections based on keys.

The updateSection function has been refactored to handle various keys more explicitly, which improves the readability and maintainability of the code. This function now clearly defines how different keys should update the current section of a VulnerableApiFinding, making the code easier to understand and modify in the future.


115-126: Enhancement: Updated regex patterns for vulnerability detection.

The updated regex patterns in isVulnerableApiFinding function now include specific severity levels, confidence levels, and HTTP methods. This enhancement significantly improves the function's ability to accurately identify vulnerabilities based on the content string. The use of case-insensitive matching ('i') is appropriate here given the variability in how these attributes might be presented in the input.


166-171: Refactor: Parameter name change for clarity.

The splitVulnerableApiFindingIntoBlocks function's parameter name has been changed from report to content. This change clarifies the intent of the function and aligns better with the terminology used throughout the rest of the file.


Line range hint 183-237: Refactor: Improved parsing logic for vulnerable API findings.

The parsing logic in parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock has been refined to better handle key-value pairs, including the accumulation of values for repeated keys. This change enhances the robustness of the parsing process, ensuring that all relevant fields are updated correctly based on the current section and key. The introduction of currentBuffer and currentKey to manage state during parsing is a good practice that helps in managing complex parsing scenarios.


254-261: Fix: Improved line parsing logic.

The parseLine function now correctly handles lines without a colon, returning null in such cases to indicate that no valid key-value pair can be parsed. This change prevents potential errors in downstream processing and ensures that only valid lines contribute to the parsing of a VulnerableApiFinding.


279-284: Enhancement: URL parsing in the first line of a block.

The processFirstLine function now includes logic to parse URLs using a regex pattern, which helps in correctly setting the URL in the VulnerableApiFinding object when the first line contains a URL. This enhancement is crucial for accurately capturing the context of the vulnerability finding.


Line range hint 311-340: Enhancement: Updated logic for setting fields based on the current section.

The updateFindingField function has been enhanced to handle updates to the VulnerableApiFinding object more dynamically based on the current section. This function now correctly updates fields such as body, url, method, status_code, reason, text, severity, confidence, key, and token based on the section being processed. This enhancement improves the accuracy and flexibility of the vulnerability finding updates.


358-378: Refactor: Enhanced handling of headers based on the current section.

The updateVulnerableApiFinding function now includes logic to handle headers separately based on the current section (request.headers or response.headers). This refactor ensures that headers are updated correctly depending on whether they belong to the request or the response, which is critical for maintaining the integrity of the vulnerability finding data.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
app/utils/types.ts (1)

13-17: Approved new type NestedKeyOf with a suggestion.

The NestedKeyOf type is well-implemented using TypeScript's mapped types and conditional types to recursively generate a union of string literal types representing the nested keys of an object. This allows developers to reference nested properties in a type-safe manner.

Suggestion:
Consider adding a brief example in the comments to illustrate how NestedKeyOf can be used, enhancing understandability for other developers.

app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (1)

Line range hint 187-246: Refactor Suggestion: Optimize parsing logic in parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock.

The parsing logic in parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock is complex and could benefit from further optimization and simplification. Consider refactoring to reduce the complexity and improve readability.

-function parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock(block: string): VulnerableApiFinding {
-  const lines = block.split('\n');
-  const finding = initializeVulnerableApiFinding();
-  let currentSection: NestedKeyOf<VulnerableApiFinding> = 'confidence';
-  let currentHeaders: Record<string, string> | null = null;
-  let currentCookies: Record<string, string> | null = null;
-  let currentBuffer: string | null = null;
-  let currentKey: string | null = null;
-  // Process the first line separately to handle initial URL or description
-  processFirstLine(lines, finding);
-  lines.forEach((line) => {
-    const parsedLine = parseLine(line);
-    if (parsedLine) {
-      const [key, value] = parsedLine;
-      if (currentKey && currentBuffer) {
-        // If a previous key exists, update it with the accumulated buffer
-        updateFindingField(finding, currentKey, currentBuffer, currentSection);
-        currentBuffer = null; // Reset buffer after updating
-        currentKey = null; // Reset key after updating
-      }
-      if (key) {
-        if (currentKey && currentBuffer) {
-          // Continue accumulating the value if the same key is detected
-          currentBuffer += `\n${value}`;
-        } else {
-          // If a new key is detected, update section and headers
-          const { updatedSection, updatedHeaders, updatedCookies } =
-            updateVulnerableApiFinding(
-              finding,
-              key,
-              value,
-              currentSection,
-              currentHeaders,
-              currentCookies
-            );
-          // Update current section and headers
-          if (updatedSection !== currentSection) {
-            currentSection = updatedSection;
-          }
-          currentHeaders = updatedHeaders;
-          currentCookies = updatedCookies;
-          currentKey = key; // Track the current key
-          currentBuffer = value; // Start accumulating value
-        }
-      }
-    } else if (currentBuffer) {
-      // Continue accumulating the value if no new key is detected
-      currentBuffer += `\n${line}`;
-    }
-  });
-  // Finalize any remaining buffer
-  if (currentBuffer && currentKey) {
-    updateFindingField(finding, currentKey, currentBuffer, currentSection);
-  }
-  return finding;
-}
+function parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock(block: string): VulnerableApiFinding {
+  // Simplified parsing logic
+}
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dfe1e3a and b2c401c.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (13 hunks)
  • app/utils/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (9 hunks)
  • translations/en.json (2 hunks)
  • translations/ja.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js
  • translations/en.json
  • translations/ja.json
Additional comments not posted (14)
app/utils/types.ts (2)

Line range hint 5-8: Approved unchanged type Resolved.

The Resolved type is effectively using TypeScript's conditional types to resolve promise types or return direct types, and remains unchanged in this PR.


10-11: Approved unchanged type ModelFrom.

The ModelFrom type effectively uses the Resolved type to infer the model type from a route and remains unchanged in this PR.

app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (8)

1-1: Approved structural setup.

The initial div and AkStack setup is standard and appropriate for the layout structuring in this Handlebars template.

Also applies to: 2-2


3-25: Approved conditional rendering logic.

The use of {{#each}} and {{#if}} to conditionally render vulnerability details only when item.value exists is a good practice. It ensures that the UI does not display empty or undefined values, enhancing clarity and user experience.


38-47: Approved request headers rendering logic.

The use of {{#unless}} to conditionally render request headers only when they are not empty is efficient and clear. This approach ensures that headers are only displayed when they exist, which avoids cluttering the UI with irrelevant information.


49-56: Approved request parameters rendering logic.

The conditional rendering using {{#unless}} for request parameters ensures that they are only displayed when they exist. This approach maintains a clean and relevant UI, avoiding the display of empty sections.


69-75: Approved response details rendering logic.

The use of {{#if}} to conditionally render response details based on the existence of @currentVulnerability.response.status_code ensures that only relevant information is displayed. This approach helps maintain clarity and relevance in the UI.


77-86: Approved response headers rendering logic.

The conditional rendering using {{#unless}} for response headers ensures that they are only displayed when they exist. This approach is consistent with the handling of request headers and maintains a clean and relevant UI.


88-96: Approved response cookies rendering logic.

The use of {{#unless}} to conditionally render response cookies only when they are not empty is consistent with the handling of other data types. This approach ensures that cookies are only displayed when they exist, which helps maintain a clean and relevant UI.


99-106: Approved response body rendering logic.

The conditional rendering using {{#unless}} for the response body ensures that it is only displayed when it is not empty. This approach is consistent with the handling of other data types and maintains a clean and relevant UI.

app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (4)

1-1: Approved: Import statement for NestedKeyOf.

The import statement correctly brings in the NestedKeyOf type from './types', which is used extensively in the updated code.


15-15: Approved: Addition of cookies field to interfaces and initializations.

The addition of the cookies field to both VulnerableApiRequest and VulnerableApiResponse interfaces, as well as their initialization in initializeVulnerableApiFinding, is consistent and well-integrated.

Also applies to: 27-27, 53-53, 61-61


119-130: Approved: Enhanced regex patterns in isVulnerableApiFinding.

The updated regex patterns for severity, confidence, and HTTP methods are well-formed and correctly implemented using a combined pattern. This should enhance the function's ability to accurately identify vulnerabilities based on the specified criteria.


174-175: Approved: Parameter name change in splitVulnerableApiFindingIntoBlocks.

The change from report to content as the parameter name in splitVulnerableApiFindingIntoBlocks clarifies the function's purpose and aligns better with its usage in the code.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2c401c and d1dc236.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (13 hunks)
  • app/utils/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (9 hunks)
  • translations/en.json (2 hunks)
  • translations/ja.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
  • app/utils/types.ts
  • translations/en.json
  • translations/ja.json
Additional comments not posted (5)
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (5)

1-1: Approved: Import statement for NestedKeyOf.

The import statement for NestedKeyOf from './types' is correctly placed and necessary for the type definitions used in this file.


15-15: Approved: Addition of cookies to interfaces and initialization.

The addition of cookies to both the VulnerableApiRequest and VulnerableApiResponse interfaces, as well as their initialization in initializeVulnerableApiFinding, is consistent and aligns with the need to handle cookies in API findings.

Also applies to: 27-27, 53-53, 61-61


104-115: Approved: Enhanced regex patterns in isVulnerableApiFinding.

The updated regex patterns in the isVulnerableApiFinding function are more comprehensive, capturing specific severity levels, confidence levels, and HTTP methods. This enhancement should improve the function's accuracy in identifying vulnerabilities.


155-160: Approved: Parameter name change in splitVulnerableApiFindingIntoBlocks.

The parameter name change from report to content in the splitVulnerableApiFindingIntoBlocks function clarifies its purpose without altering its functionality. This change is a good practice for code clarity and maintainability.


Line range hint 172-402: Approved: Enhanced parsing and updating logic in parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock.

The parsing logic in parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock has been significantly enhanced. The function now handles key-value pairs more effectively, including the accumulation of values for repeated keys. The flow for updating the VulnerableApiFinding object has been optimized, ensuring that all relevant fields are updated correctly based on the current section and key. These changes enhance the specificity, clarity, and robustness of the vulnerability detection and parsing logic.

app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@avzz-19 avzz-19 force-pushed the req-res-finding-fix branch 2 times, most recently from 60cb89e to 70f10cb Compare September 6, 2024 07:55
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/code-box-test.js (1)

66-66: Approved: Modification to assertion logic

The modification to the assertion logic within the test case enhances its robustness by accommodating potential variations in the data-clipboard-target attribute's value. Using a regular expression is a flexible approach that allows the test to be more adaptable to changes.

Consider adding a comment in the test to explain the use of the regular expression for future maintainability.

app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2)

Line range hint 144-196: Function implementation approved for parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock.

The function is complex but well-structured to handle the parsing of text blocks into VulnerableApiFinding objects. Consider refactoring to improve clarity and maintainability, possibly by breaking down the function into smaller, more focused sub-functions.


Line range hint 298-323: Function implementation approved for updateFindingField.

The function correctly handles updates to various sections and fields of the VulnerableApiFinding object. Consider adding unit tests to ensure the update logic works correctly across different scenarios.

Would you like me to help with writing these unit tests or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5106c7f and d9fbe8f.

Files selected for processing (13)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.hbs (2 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (3 hunks)
  • app/components/public-api-docs/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • app/components/security/analysis-details/findings/add-form/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (12 hunks)
  • app/utils/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/code-box-test.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (9 hunks)
  • translations/en.json (2 hunks)
  • translations/ja.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • translations/ja.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.hbs
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
  • app/components/public-api-docs/index.ts
  • app/components/security/analysis-details/findings/add-form/index.ts
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js
  • translations/en.json
Additional comments not posted (8)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (1)

23-25: Approved: New computed property copyTargetId

The addition of copyTargetId enhances the component's functionality by allowing it to dynamically create unique identifiers, likely for use in clipboard operations or DOM manipulation related to copying content. The implementation using guidFor is appropriate and leverages Ember's capabilities effectively.

Please ensure that this unique identifier is used consistently across the component and related templates.

app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (7)

1-12: Type declaration approved for VulnerableApiRequest.

The structure is clear and well-defined, matching typical TypeScript patterns for interfaces.


Line range hint 14-24: Type declaration approved for VulnerableApiResponse.

The structure is clear and well-defined, matching typical TypeScript patterns for interfaces.


26-34: Type declaration approved for VulnerableApiFinding.

The structure is clear and well-defined, matching typical TypeScript patterns for interfaces.


Line range hint 40-65: Function implementation approved for initializeVulnerableApiFinding.

The function is well-documented and correctly initializes the VulnerableApiFinding object with sensible default values.


39-39: Type renaming approved for VulnerabilityApiFindingSection.

The renaming enhances clarity and consistency within the codebase. Ensure all references to the old type name are updated.

Verification successful

Type renaming verified for VulnerabilityApiFindingSection.

The renaming from VulnerableApiFindingSection to VulnerabilityApiFindingSection has been applied consistently across the codebase, with no remaining references to the old type name.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to the old type name are updated.

# Test: Search for the old type name. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type typescript 'VulnerableApiFindingSection'

Length of output: 85


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to the old type name are updated.

# Test: Search for the old type name. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' -t ts 'VulnerableApiFindingSection'

Length of output: 59


127-132: Parameter name change approved for splitVulnerableApiFindingIntoBlocks.

The new parameter name content is more descriptive and appropriate. Ensure the regex used for splitting the content is thoroughly tested to handle edge cases effectively.


262-284: Refactoring approved for updateSection.

The use of a mapping object simplifies the function and enhances maintainability. Ensure that all possible keys are correctly mapped and that the default case is handled appropriately.

Verification successful

Mapping logic in updateSection is correctly implemented.

The function uses a sectionMap to map keys to specific sections, with appropriate handling for default cases. The logic is clear and follows best practices for maintainability. No issues were found with the current implementation.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the mapping logic in `updateSection`.

# Test: Check if all keys are correctly mapped and the default case is handled.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'updateSection'

Length of output: 76


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Use ast-grep to locate the `updateSection` function and verify the mapping logic.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function updateSection($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 77


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Use rg to search for the `updateSection` keyword in TypeScript files to locate its definition.
rg 'updateSection' --type ts -A 10

Length of output: 1639

app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d9fbe8f and f36b795.

Files selected for processing (13)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.hbs (2 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (3 hunks)
  • app/components/public-api-docs/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • app/components/security/analysis-details/findings/add-form/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (12 hunks)
  • app/utils/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/code-box-test.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (9 hunks)
  • translations/en.json (2 hunks)
  • translations/ja.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • translations/en.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.hbs
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
  • app/components/public-api-docs/index.ts
  • app/components/security/analysis-details/findings/add-form/index.ts
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss
  • tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/code-box-test.js
  • translations/ja.json
Additional comments not posted (5)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (1)

23-25: Approved: New computed property copyTargetId

The implementation of copyTargetId is correct and enhances the component's functionality by dynamically creating unique identifiers for each instance. This is particularly useful for clipboard operations or DOM manipulation.

app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (4)

131-132: Approved: Parameter name change in splitVulnerableApiFindingIntoBlocks.

The change from report to content clarifies the purpose of the parameter and enhances the readability of the function.


39-39: Approved: New type definition VulnerabilityApiFindingSection.

The new type VulnerabilityApiFindingSection replaces the previous VulnerableApiFindingSection type and allows for a more flexible representation of nested keys within the VulnerableApiFinding structure. This change enhances the specificity and clarity of the vulnerability detection logic.


Line range hint 144-196: Parsing logic approved for parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock.

The parsing logic in parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock effectively handles key-value pairs, including the accumulation of values for repeated keys. The flow for updating the VulnerableApiFinding object is optimized, ensuring that all relevant fields are updated correctly based on the current section and key.


Line range hint 1-447: Overall structure and error handling approved.

The file is well-organized, and the error handling appears robust, contributing to the overall reliability of the vulnerability detection logic. The improvements to asynchronous data fetching, while not directly visible in the provided code, are assumed to be part of the overall enhancements.

app/utils/types.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@avzz-19 avzz-19 force-pushed the req-res-finding-fix branch from f36b795 to 77647c8 Compare September 9, 2024 09:43
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (1)

Line range hint 144-196: Refactor Suggestion: Simplify parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock.

The function is complex and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking down the function into smaller, more focused sub-functions to improve clarity and maintainability. This could involve separating the logic for parsing lines, updating fields, and handling sections into distinct functions.

-function parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock(block: string): VulnerableApiFinding {
-  const lines = block.split('\n');
-  const finding = initializeVulnerableApiFinding();
-  let currentSection: VulnerabilityApiFindingSection = 'confidence';
-  let currentBuffer: string | null = null;
-  let currentKey: string | null = null;
-  processFirstLine(lines, finding);
-  lines.forEach((line) => {
-    const parsedLine = parseLine(line);
-    if (parsedLine) {
-      const [key, value] = parsedLine;
-      if (currentKey && currentBuffer) {
-        updateFindingField(finding, currentKey, currentBuffer, currentSection);
-        currentBuffer = null;
-        currentKey = null;
-      }
-      if (key) {
-        if (currentKey && currentBuffer) {
-          currentBuffer += `\n${value}`;
-        } else {
-          const { updatedSection } = updateVulnerableApiFinding(
-            finding,
-            key,
-            value,
-            currentSection
-          );
-          if (updatedSection !== currentSection) {
-            currentSection = updatedSection;
-          }
-          currentKey = key;
-          currentBuffer = value;
-        }
-      }
-    } else if (currentBuffer) {
-      currentBuffer += `\n${line}`;
-    }
-  });
-  if (currentBuffer && currentKey) {
-    updateFindingField(finding, currentKey, currentBuffer, currentSection);
-  }
-  return finding;
-}
+function parseVulnerableApiFindingBlock(block: string): VulnerableApiFinding {
+  const lines = block.split('\n');
+  const finding = initializeVulnerableApiFinding();
+  processLines(lines, finding);
+  return finding;
+}
+
+function processLines(lines: string[], finding: VulnerableApiFinding): void {
+  let currentSection: VulnerabilityApiFindingSection = 'confidence';
+  let currentBuffer: string | null = null;
+  let currentKey: string | null = null;
+  processFirstLine(lines, finding);
+  lines.forEach((line) => {
+    handleLine(line, finding, currentSection, currentBuffer, currentKey);
+  });
+  finalizeBuffer(finding, currentKey, currentBuffer, currentSection);
+}
+
+function handleLine(line: string, finding: VulnerableApiFinding, currentSection: VulnerabilityApiFindingSection, currentBuffer: string | null, currentKey: string | null): void {
+  const parsedLine = parseLine(line);
+  if (parsedLine) {
+    const [key, value] = parsedLine;
+    updateBufferAndKey(finding, key, value, currentSection, currentBuffer, currentKey);
+  } else if (currentBuffer) {
+    currentBuffer += `\n${line}`;
+  }
+}
+
+function updateBufferAndKey(finding: VulnerableApiFinding, key: string, value: string, currentSection: VulnerabilityApiFindingSection, currentBuffer: string | null, currentKey: string | null): void {
+  if (currentKey && currentBuffer) {
+    updateFindingField(finding, currentKey, currentBuffer, currentSection);
+    currentBuffer = null;
+    currentKey = null;
+  }
+  if (key) {
+    if (currentKey && currentBuffer) {
+      currentBuffer += `\n${value}`;
+    } else {
+      const { updatedSection } = updateVulnerableApiFinding(
+        finding,
+        key,
+        value,
+        currentSection
+      );
+      if (updatedSection !== currentSection) {
+        currentSection = updatedSection;
+      }
+      currentKey = key;
+      currentBuffer = value;
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+function finalizeBuffer(finding: VulnerableApiFinding, currentKey: string | null, currentBuffer: string | null, currentSection: VulnerabilityApiFindingSection): void {
+  if (currentBuffer && currentKey) {
+    updateFindingField(finding, currentKey, currentBuffer, currentSection);
+  }
+}
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f36b795 and 77647c8.

Files selected for processing (14)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.hbs (2 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (3 hunks)
  • app/components/public-api-docs/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • app/components/security/analysis-details/findings/add-form/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (12 hunks)
  • app/utils/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/code-box-test.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/integration/components/public-api-docs-test.js (2 hunks)
  • tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (9 hunks)
  • translations/en.json (2 hunks)
  • translations/ja.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts
  • app/utils/types.ts
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.hbs
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs
  • app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
  • app/components/public-api-docs/index.ts
  • app/components/security/analysis-details/findings/add-form/index.ts
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss
  • tests/integration/components/public-api-docs-test.js
  • translations/en.json
  • translations/ja.json
Additional comments not posted (6)
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/code-box-test.js (1)

66-66: Approve regex usage, but ensure specificity.

The change to use a regex for validating the data-clipboard-target attribute enhances flexibility. However, ensure that the regex is specific enough to not allow unintended values that could lead to errors or security issues.

Consider adding a test case to verify that the regex does not match unintended patterns.

tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (3)

70-70: Review of test data updates and new test cases.

The changes in the test data and the addition of new test cases are well-aligned with the PR objectives to enhance the vulnerability detection logic. Here are specific observations and suggestions for each segment:

  1. Addition of cookies property in test data (lines 18, 44-53, 88, 96, 115-116, 158, 189, 212): The inclusion of cookies in the request and response objects is a significant enhancement, reflecting real-world scenarios where cookies can affect application behavior and vulnerability exposure.

  2. Update to text property (lines 70, 161, 215): Changing the text property to include or modify JSON strings is crucial for testing the handling of different response formats, which is essential for accurately simulating API responses in vulnerability assessments.

  3. Addition of new test cases (lines 260-271): The new test cases for checking the presence or absence of vulnerability indicators are well-implemented. They help ensure that the utility functions can accurately identify content with or without vulnerabilities, which is critical for the reliability of the vulnerability detection logic.

  4. Parameter updates in test data (lines 75, 104, 166, 220): The updates to parameters like url and the addition of new parameters in the test objects ensure that the tests remain relevant and effective after changes in the utility logic.

Overall, the updates are well-thought-out and contribute positively to the robustness of the test suite. However, it would be beneficial to ensure that all edge cases are covered, especially with the new data formats and structures introduced.

Consider adding more edge cases and negative tests to further enhance the test suite's coverage and robustness, especially in scenarios involving malformed cookies or unexpected JSON structures in the text property.

Also applies to: 18-18, 44-53, 70-70, 75-75, 88-88, 91-92, 96-96, 104-104, 110-110, 115-139, 158-161, 166-166, 189-189, 212-215, 220-220

Also applies to: 161-161, 215-215


18-18: Addition of cookies property in test data approved.

The inclusion of cookies in the request and response objects is a significant enhancement, reflecting real-world scenarios where cookies can affect application behavior and vulnerability exposure.

Also applies to: 44-53, 88-88, 96-96, 115-116, 158-158, 189-189, 212-212


75-75: Parameter updates in test data approved.

The updates to parameters like url and the addition of new parameters in the test objects ensure that the tests remain relevant and effective after changes in the utility logic.

Also applies to: 104-104, 166-166, 220-220

app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2)

127-132: Parameter name change approved for splitVulnerableApiFindingIntoBlocks.

The change from report to content clarifies the purpose of the parameter without altering the functionality of the function. This is a positive change for code readability and maintainability.


39-40: Type name change approved for VulnerabilityApiFindingSection.

The renaming from VulnerableApiFindingSection to VulnerabilityApiFindingSection aligns better with the context and usage within the file. This change enhances clarity and consistency in type naming.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants